You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15280
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Daniela Micheline dos-
dc.contributor.authorGoiato, Marcelo Coelho-
dc.contributor.authorMoreno, Amalia-
dc.contributor.authorPesqueira, Aldieris Alves-
dc.contributor.authorHaddad, Marcela Filie-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:30:06Z-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:43:44Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T16:58:14Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:30:06Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:43:44Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T16:58:14Z-
dc.date.issued2011-04-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00657.x-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Prosthodontics-implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry. Malden: Wiley-blackwell, v. 20, n. 3, p. 205-208, 2011.-
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15280-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15280-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of two pigments (ceramic powder and oil paint) and one opacifier (barium sulfate) on the color stability of MDX4-4210 facial silicone submitted to accelerated aging.Materials and Methods: Sixty specimens of silicone were fabricated and divided into six groups-colorless (G1), colorless with opacifier (G2), ceramic (G3), ceramic with opacifier (G4), oil (G5), oil with opacifier (G6). All replicas were submitted to accelerated aging for 1008 hours. The evaluations of chromatic alteration through visual analysis and reflection spectrophotometry were carried out initially and after 252, 504, and 1008 hours of aging. The results were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5% level of significance.Results: All groups exhibited chromatic alteration (Delta E > 0); however, this color alteration was not perceptible through visual analysis of the color. The pigmented groups with opacifier presented the lowest Delta E values, with a statistical difference from the other groups. For the groups without opacifier, the group pigmented with oil paint exhibited the lowest Delta E values in the different aging periods, with a statistical difference. Accelerated aging generated significant chromatic alterations in all groups after 252 hours, except for the colorless and oil groups, both with opacifier (G2 and G6).Conclusions: The opacifier protects facial silicones against color degradation, and oil paint is a stable pigment even without addition of opacifier.en
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)-
dc.format.extent205-208-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectSiliconesen
dc.subjectprosthesis pigmentationen
dc.subjectmaxillofacial prosthesisen
dc.titleInfluence of Pigments and Opacifiers on Color Stability of an Artificially Aged Facial Siliconeen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUNESP, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-16015050 Aracatuba, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-16015050 Aracatuba, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 07/58925-9-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00657.x-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000290147900008-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthodontics-implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3800-3050pt
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.