You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15293
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShibayama, Ricardo-
dc.contributor.authorGennari Filho, Humberto-
dc.contributor.authorMazaro, José Vitor Quinelli-
dc.contributor.authorVedovatto, Eduardo-
dc.contributor.authorAssunção, Wirley Goncalves-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:30:09Z-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:43:45Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T16:58:16Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:30:09Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:43:45Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T16:58:16Z-
dc.date.issued2009-04-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00421.x-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Prosthodontics-implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry. Malden: Wiley-blackwell, v. 18, n. 3, p. 259-264, 2009.-
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15293-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15293-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the artificial tooth positional changes following the flasking and polymerization of complete dentures by a combination of two flasking methods and two polymerization techniques using computer graphic measurements.Materials and Methods: Four groups of waxed complete dentures (n = 10) were invested and polymerized using the following techniques: (1) adding a second investment layer of gypsum and conventional water bath polymerization (Control), (2) adding a second investment layer of gypsum and polymerization with microwave energy (Gyp-micro), (3) adding a second investment layer of silicone (Zetalabor) and conventional polymerization (Silwater), and (4) adding a second investment layer of silicone and polymerization with microwave energy (Silmicro). For each specimen, six segments of interdental distances (A to F) were measured to determine the artificial tooth positions in the waxed and polymerized stages using software program AutoCad R14. The mean values of the changes were statistically compared by univariate ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test at 5% significance.Results: There were no significant differences among the four groups, except for segment D of the Silmicro group (-0.004 +/- 0.032 cm) in relation to the Gypwater group (0.044 +/- 0.031 cm) (p < 0.05), which presented, repectively, expansion and shrinkage after polymerization.Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that although the differences were not statistically significant, the use of a silicone investment layer when flasking complete dentures resulted in the least positional changes of the artificial teeth regardless of the polymerization technique.en
dc.format.extent259-264-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectMaxillary complete dentureen
dc.subjectacrylic resinsen
dc.subjectmicrowaveen
dc.subjectsiliconeen
dc.subjectartificial toothen
dc.titleEffect of Flasking and Polymerization Techniques on Tooth Movement in Complete Denture Processingen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Dept Restorat Dent, Londrina, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Sch Dent Aracatuba, Dept Prosthodont & Dent Mat, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Sch Dent Aracatuba, Dept Prosthodont & Dent Mat, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00421.x-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000207914300011-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthodontics-implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.