You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15312
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTonella, Bianca Piccolotto-
dc.contributor.authorPellizzer, Eduardo Piza-
dc.contributor.authorFalcon-Antenucci, Rosse Mary-
dc.contributor.authorFerraco, Renato-
dc.contributor.authorde Faria Almeida, Daniel Augusto-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:30:14Z-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:43:48Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T16:58:18Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:30:14Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:43:48Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T16:58:18Z-
dc.date.issued2011-11-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182319812-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Craniofacial Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 22, n. 6, p. 2060-2063, 2011.-
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15312-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15312-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the stress distribution on external hexagon, internal hexagon, and Morse taper implant in single and 3-unit implant-supported fixed partial prostheses (FPPs) using photoelasticity. Six models were fabricated with the photoelastic resin PL-2: 3 models for the 3-unit implant-supported FPP with implants of 4.0 x 10.0 mm in the region of the second premolar and molar including 1 model for each type of implant connection, and 3 models for the single prosthesis for each implant type. The prostheses fabrication was standardized. A circular polariscope was used, and axial and oblique (45 degrees) loads of 100 N were applied in a universal testing machine. The results were photographed and analyzed qualitatively. The internal hexagon implant exhibited better stress distribution and lower intensity of fringes followed by the external hexagon and Morse taper implants for the models with the 3-unit prostheses. For the single implants, the Morse taper implant presented better stress distribution, followed by the internal and external hexagon implants. The oblique loading increased the number of photoelastic fringes in all models. It was concluded that the internal hexagon implant exhibited better biomechanical behavior for the 3-unit implant-supported FPP, whereas the Morse taper implant was more favorable for the single implant-supported prosthesis. The oblique loading increased the stress in all models.en
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)-
dc.description.sponsorshipConexao Sistema de Protese Ltda.-
dc.format.extent2060-2063-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectDental implanten
dc.subjectinternal hexagonen
dc.subjectexternal hexagonen
dc.subjectMorse taperen
dc.subjectimplant-supported prosthesesen
dc.subjectphotoelasticityen
dc.titlePhotoelastic Analysis of Biomechanical Behavior of Single and Multiple Fixed Partial Prostheses With Different Prosthetic Connectionsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 07/55061-3-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182319812-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000297741900042-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Craniofacial Surgery-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.