You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15440
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMauro, Silvio José-
dc.contributor.authorDurao, V. C. A.-
dc.contributor.authorBriso, André Luiz Fraga-
dc.contributor.authorSundefeld, Maria Lúcia Marçal Mazza-
dc.contributor.authorRahal, V.-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:31:02Z-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:44:07Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T16:58:32Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:31:02Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:44:07Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T16:58:32Z-
dc.date.issued2012-04-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.01.004-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives. Oxford: Elsevier B.V., v. 34, p. 6-10, 2012.-
dc.identifier.issn0143-7496-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15440-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15440-
dc.description.abstractThe success of a restoration depends on the interaction between the adhesive system and the dental substrate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of microleakage in class II resin restorations using different adhesive systems light cured in enamel and dentin: conventional and self-etching acrylic. For that purpose 40 human molars were sectioned in buccal-lingual direction, making up 80 samples (40 mesial and 40 distal halves). Each sample had cavities class II prepared and the occlusal margins were kept in enamel while the cervical margins were kept in dentin. The specimens were divided into four groups (n=20) according to the adhesive system used. After restorative and thermocycling procedures the degree of dye leakage was qualified using a stereomicroscopic loupe (45X). Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests (alpha=0.05). Results obtained for occlusal (enamel) and cervical (dentin) margins (pm) were, respectively: GI-11.45, 20.7; GII-15.4, 19.4; GIII-23.3, 24.05; GIV-31.85, 17.85. In enamel, the self-etching adhesive systems presented the less control of marginal leakage in the occlusal and cervical margins. Although for the dentin there was no difference among the adhesive systems used. It was concluded that no adhesive system hermetically sealed the restorations with cavity margins in enamel or dentin and self-etching adhesives did not improve microleakage controlling when compared to conventional systems. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectCompositesen
dc.subjectBiological adhesionen
dc.subjectMicroscopyen
dc.titleEffect of different adhesive systems on microleakage in class II composite resin restorationsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Restorat Dent, Aracatuba, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Pediat & Community Dent, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Restorat Dent, Aracatuba, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Pediat & Community Dent, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 04/02656-1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.01.004-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000301750300002-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.