You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15459
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMagalhaes, A. C.-
dc.contributor.authorKato, M. T.-
dc.contributor.authorRios, D.-
dc.contributor.authorWiegand, A.-
dc.contributor.authorAttin, T.-
dc.contributor.authorBuzalaf, M. A. R.-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:30:27Z-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:44:10Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T16:58:33Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:30:27Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:44:10Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T16:58:33Z-
dc.date.issued2008-01-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000135672-
dc.identifier.citationCaries Research. Basel: Karger, v. 42, n. 4, p. 269-274, 2008.-
dc.identifier.issn0008-4166-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15459-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15459-
dc.description.abstractThis in vitro study assessed the effect of an experimental 4% TiF(4) varnish compared to commercial NaF and NaF/CaF(2) varnishes and 4% TiF(4) solution on enamel erosion. For this, 72 bovine enamel specimens were randomly allocated to the following treatments: NaF varnish (2.26% F), NaF/CaF(2) varnish (5.63% F), 4% TiF(4) varnish (2.45% F), F-free placebo varnish, 4% TiF(4) solution (2.45% F) and control (not treated). The varnishes were applied in a thin layer and removed after 6 h. The solution was applied to the enamel surface for 1 min. Then, the specimens were alternately de- and remineralized (6 times/day) in an artificial mouth for 5 days at 37 degrees C. Demineralization was performed with the beverage Sprite (1 min, 3 ml/min) and remineralization with artificial saliva (day: 59 min, 0.5 ml/min; during the night: 0.1 ml/min). The mean daily increment of erosion and the cumulative erosion data were tested using ANOVA and ANCOVA, respectively, followed by Tukey's test (alpha = 0.05). The mean daily erosion increments and cumulative erosion (micrometers) were significantly less for the TiF(4) varnish (0.30 +/- 0.11/0.65 +/- 0.75) than for the NaF varnish (0.58 +/- 0.11/1.47 +/- 1.07) or the NaF/CaF(2) varnish (0.62 +/- 0.10/1.68 +/- 1.17), which in turn showed significantly less erosion than the placebo varnish (0.78 +/- 0.12/2.05 +/- 1.43), TiF(4) solution (0.86 +/- 0.11/2.05 +/- 1.49) and control (0.77 +/- 0.16/2.06 +/- 1.49). In conclusion, the TiF(4) varnish seems to be a promising treatment to reduce enamel loss under mild erosive conditions. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.en
dc.format.extent269-274-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherKarger-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectdental erosionen
dc.subjectenamelen
dc.subjectfluorideen
dc.subjecttitaniumen
dc.titleThe effect of an experimental 4% TiF(4) varnish compared to NaF varnishes and 4% TiF(4) solution on dental erosion in vitroen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Zurich-
dc.description.affiliationUniv São Paulo, Bauru Sch Dent, Dept Biol Sci, BR-17012901 Bauru, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, UNESP, Sch Dent, Dept Child & Social Dent, Aracatuba, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Zurich, Clin Prevent Dent Periodontol & Cariol, Zurich, Switzerland-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, UNESP, Sch Dent, Dept Child & Social Dent, Aracatuba, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000135672-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000258317800005-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofCaries Research-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.