You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15744
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCilense Zuanon, Angela Cristina-
dc.contributor.authorSantos-Pinto, Lourdes Aparecida Martins dos-
dc.contributor.authorAzevedo, Elcilaine Rizzato-
dc.contributor.authorLima, Luciana Monti-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:31:21Z-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:44:52Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T16:59:00Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:31:21Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:44:52Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T16:59:00Z-
dc.date.issued2008-09-01-
dc.identifierhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18942602-
dc.identifier.citationPediatric Dentistry. Chicago: Amer Acad Pediatric Dentistry, v. 30, n. 5, p. 420-423, 2008.-
dc.identifier.issn0164-1263-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15744-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/15744-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study's purpose was to assess the amount of dental enamel loss on primary incisors after manual or mechanical microabrasion with a phosphoric acid/pumice poste. Methods: Ten exfoliated primary maxillary incisors were bisected faciolingually and the resulting 20 halves were randomly assigned to 2 groups: group 1 (N=10) manual technique (plastic spatula); and group 2 (N=10) mechanical technique (rubber cup attached to a low-speed handpiece). Microabrasion was performed on the buccal surface using an abrasive paste prepared with 37% phosphoric acid and pumice. Ten 20-second applications alternated with 20-second risings were performed in each group. Enamel thickness measurements made under stereomi-croscopy before and after microabrasion were analyzed statistically by analysis of variance and pairwise t test. Results: There was a statistically significant difference (P=.003) between the manual and mechanical techniques. The mechanical technique produced a mean enamel loss of 274.16 mu m (66% of total enamel thickness), while the mean enamel loss with the manual technique was 152.59 mu m (39% of total enamel thickness). Conclusion: Manual microabrasion using a plastic spatula removed less enamel, but was sufficient to eliminate most superficial stains and defects, and may be a viable option for the microabrasive technique on primary teeth. (Pediatr Dent 2008;30:420-3) Received March 15, 2007 / Lost Revision September 19, 2007 / Revision Accepted October 19, 2007en
dc.format.extent420-423-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherAmer Acad Pediatric Dentistry-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectMICROABRASIONen
dc.subjectDENTAL ENAMELen
dc.subjectPRIMARY TEETHen
dc.titlePrimary Tooth Enamel Loss After Manual and Mechanical Microabrasionen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sch Dent Araraquara, Dept Pediat Dent, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sch Dent Araraquara, Masters Degree Program Dent Sci, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sch Dent Araraquara, PhD Program Dent Sci, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sch Dent Araraquara, Dept Pediat Dent, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sch Dent Araraquara, Masters Degree Program Dent Sci, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sch Dent Araraquara, PhD Program Dent Sci, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000207663600008-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofPediatric Dentistry-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2386-842X-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.