You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/16445
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGrassi Fais, Laiza Maria-
dc.contributor.authorPereira Pinelli, Ligia Antunes-
dc.contributor.authorAdabo, Gelson Luis-
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa Tavares da Silva, Regina Helena-
dc.contributor.authorMarcelo, Caroline Canhizares-
dc.contributor.authorGuaglianoni, Dalton Geraldo-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:46:27Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:46:27Z-
dc.date.issued2009-11-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000600009-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Applied Oral Science. Bauru-sp: Univ São Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauru, v. 17, n. 6, p. 584-589, 2009.-
dc.identifier.issn1678-7757-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/16445-
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study compared the cutting capacity of carbide burs sterilized with microwaves and traditional sterilization methods. Material and Methods: Sixty burs were divided into 5 groups according to the sterilization methods: dry heat (G1), autoclave (G2), microwave irradiation (G3), glutaraldehyde (G4) or control - no sterilization (G5). The burs were used to cut glass plates in a cutting machine set for twelve 2.5-min periods and, after each period, they were sterilized (except G5) following the protocol established for each group. The cutting capacity of the burs was determined by a weight-loss method. Data were analyzed statistically by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's test. Results: The means of the cutting amount performed by each group after the 12 periods were G1 = 0.2167 +/- 0.0627 g; G2 = 0.2077 +/- 0.0231 g; G3 = 0.1980 +/- 0.0326 g; G4 = 0.1203 +/- 0.0459 g; G5 = 0.2642 +/- 0.0359 g. There were statistically significant differences among the groups (p<0.05); only dry heat sterilization was similar to the control. Conclusion: Sterilization by dry heat was the method that least affected the cutting capacity of the carbide burs and microwave sterilization was not better than traditional sterilization methods.en
dc.description.sponsorshipPROAP-
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)-
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)-
dc.format.extent584-589-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherUniversidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectSterilizationen
dc.subjectDental instrumentsen
dc.subjectInfection controlen
dc.subjectMicrowavesen
dc.titleInfluence of microwave sterilization on the cutting capacity of carbide bursen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Araraquara Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Araraquara, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Sch Sci & Letters, Dept Math & Stat, Araraquara, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Araraquara Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Araraquara, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Sch Sci & Letters, Dept Math & Stat, Araraquara, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000272950100009-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.fileS1678-77572009000600009.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Oral Science-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.