You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/16648
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorQueiroz, T. P.-
dc.contributor.authorHochuli-Vieira, D.-
dc.contributor.authorGabrielli, MAC-
dc.contributor.authorCancian, DCJ-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:46:55Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:00:28Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:46:55Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:00:28Z-
dc.date.issued2006-01-01-
dc.identifierhttp://www.quintpub.com/journals/omi/abstract.php?article_id=2111#.UulUSLRTvIU-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Hanover Park: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc., v. 21, n. 1, p. 29-35, 2006.-
dc.identifier.issn0882-2786-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/16648-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/16648-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study was proposed to analyze histologically the process of repairing bone defects created surgically in the cranial vaults of rabbits. Materials and Methods: Thirty adult male rabbits (Oryctolagus cunilicus) received, under general anesthesia, bilateral parietal osteotomies by means of a 6mm-diameter trephine. The bony defects were divided into 4 groups. In group 1 the defect did not receive any treatment; in group 2 the defect was filled with lyophilized bovine bone (Biograft); in group 3 it was filled with bovine bone and covered with a bone matrix membrane (Bioplate); in group 4 it was covered with a bone matrix membrane. Animals were sacrificed in 3 equal groups at 15, 30, and 60 days. The specimens were subjected to routine laboratory procedures to evaluate the degree of bone repair. Results: After 60 days, new bone formation in group 2 was not satisfactory when compared to that of group 3. Large amounts of new bone formation in maturation were seen in group 3. In the defects covered with a membrane the results were similar to those of group 1 (ie, the cavity was filled with fibrous connective tissue). The implanted bone and membranes were totally resorbed. Discussion and Conclusions: the use of a membrane served as a barrier against the migration of cells from the adjacent tissue and the bone graft/membrane preserved the cavity space, resulting in an enhanced osteogenic effect.en
dc.format.extent29-35-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Inc-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectbone graftingpt
dc.subjectbone regenerationpt
dc.subjectcranial vault reconstructionpt
dc.subjectresorbable membranespt
dc.subjectxenograftspt
dc.titleUse of bovine bone graft and bone membrane in defects surgically created in the cranial vault of rabbits. Histologic comparative analysisen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUNESP, Dent Sch Araraquara, Div Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Dept Diagnost & Surg, BR-14801930 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP, Dent Sch Araraquara, Div Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Dept Diagnost & Surg, BR-14801930 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000235852100002-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.