You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/16683
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNascimento, Andresa Piacezzi-
dc.contributor.authorGuerreiro Tanomaru, Juliane Maria-
dc.contributor.authorMatoba-Junior, Fumio-
dc.contributor.authorWatanabe, Evandro-
dc.contributor.authorTanomaru-Filho, Mario-
dc.contributor.authorIto, Izabel Yoko-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:47:01Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:47:01Z-
dc.date.issued2008-09-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572008000500006-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Applied Oral Science. Bauru-sp: Univ São Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauru, v. 16, n. 5, p. 336-339, 2008.-
dc.identifier.issn1678-7757-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/16683-
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of the present study was to determine the in vitro maximum inhibitory dilution (MID) of two chlorhexidine-based oral mouthwashes (CHX): Noplak (R), Periogard (R), and one polyhexamethylene biguanide-based mouthwash (PHMB): Sanifill Premium (R) against 28 field Staphylococcus aureus strains using the agar dilution method. Materials and Methods: For each product, decimal dilutions ranging from 1/10 to 1/655,360 were prepared in distilled water and added to Mueller Hinton Agar culture medium. After homogenization, the culture medium was poured onto Petri dishes. Strains were inoculated using a Steers multipoint inoculator and dishes were incubated at 37 degrees C for 24hours. For reading, MID was considered as the maximum dilution of the mouthwash still capable of inhibiting microbial growth. Results: Sanifill Premium (R) inhibited the growth of all strains at 1/40 dilution and of 1 strain at 1/80 dilution. Noplak (R) inhibited the growth of 23 strains at 1/640 dilution and of all 28 strains at 1/320 dilution. Periogard (R) showed inhibited growth of 7 strains at 1/640 dilution and of all 28 strains at 1/320 dilution. Data were submitted to Kruskal-Wallis statistical test, showing significant differences between the mouthwashes evaluated (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between Noplak (R) and Periogard (R) (p>0.05). Sanifill Premium (R) was the least effective (p<0.05). Conclusion: It was concluded that CHX-based mouthwashes present better antimicrobial activity against S. Aureus than the PHMB-based mouthwash.en
dc.format.extent336-339-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherUniversidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectBacteriaen
dc.subjectAnti-infective agentsen
dc.subjectChlorhexidineen
dc.titleMaximum inhibitory dilution of mouthwashes containing chlorhexidine and polyhexamethylene biguanide against salivary Staphylococcus aureusen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniv São Paulo, Sch Pharmaceut Sci Ribeirao Preto, BR-14049 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Araraquara Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Araraquara, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv São Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Sch Dent, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Araraquara Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Araraquara, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000266688400006-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.fileS1678-77572008000500006.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Oral Science-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.