You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/16703
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBernardes, Ricardo Affonso-
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Emerson Antunes-
dc.contributor.authorHungaro Duarte, Marco Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorVivan, Rodrigo Ricci-
dc.contributor.authorde Moraes, Ivaldo Gomes-
dc.contributor.authorBramante, Alexandre S.-
dc.contributor.authorde Azevedo, Jose Ribamar-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:47:03Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:00:35Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:47:03Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:00:35Z-
dc.date.issued2010-07-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.033-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Endodontics. New York: Elsevier B.V., v. 36, n. 7, p. 1179-1182, 2010.-
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/16703-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/16703-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The aim of this study was to compare the increase of the root canal area after instrumentation with EndoSequence or ProTaper rotary systems. Methods: Twenty-two mesial root canals from mandibular molars were instrumented. Teeth were mounted on a base, numbered, and divided into 2 groups; teeth from 1-11 (PT group) were instrumented by using the ProTaper system, and teeth from 12-22 (ES group) were instrumented by using the EndoSequence system. Cone beam computed tomography was performed on all teeth before and after instrumentation. Measurements at 3,5, and 7 mm as well as differences in instrument performance were statistically compared by the Student t test at 5% significance level. Results: Both systems increased significantly the root canal area (P < .05) at all levels. Comparison between the rotary systems showed significantly greater increase (P < .05) for EndoSequence at 3 mm, with no statistically significant difference (P < .05) at the other levels. Conclusions: Both rotary systems increased significantly the root canal area. (J Endod 2010;36:1179-1182)en
dc.format.extent1179-1182-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectCone beam CTen
dc.subjectEndoSequenceen
dc.subjectProTaperen
dc.subjectrotary systemsen
dc.titleRoot Canal Area Increase Promoted by the EndoSequence and ProTaper Systems: Comparison by Computed Tomographyen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionCPO SL Mand Brasiliense Dent Sch-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionInst Odonto Radiol Brasilia-
dc.description.affiliationCPO SL Mand Brasiliense Dent Sch, Brasilia, DF, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv São Paulo, Bauru Sch Dent, Dept Dent Dent Mat & Endodont, Bauru, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Dent Sch Araraquara, Dept Restorat Dent, Araraquara, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationInst Odonto Radiol Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Dent Sch Araraquara, Dept Restorat Dent, Araraquara, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.033-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000279802000013-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Endodontics-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record Show full item record   View Statistics
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.