You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/16749
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCamara, Alexandre Sandri-
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Renata de Castro-
dc.contributor.authorDiniz Viana, Ana Cecilia-
dc.contributor.authorLeonardo, Renato de Toledo-
dc.contributor.authorLopes Buono, Vicente Tadeu-
dc.contributor.authorde Azevedo Bahia, Maria Guiomar-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:47:09Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:00:40Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:47:09Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:00:40Z-
dc.date.issued2009-01-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.10.006-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Endodontics. New York: Elsevier B.V., v. 35, n. 1, p. 113-116, 2009.-
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/16749-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/16749-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to assess how the geometric and dimensional changes made on ProTaper Universal (PTU) instruments in comparison with ProTaper (PT) instruments affected their flexibility and torsional strength. Two groups (n = 12) of each type of shaping (S1 and S2) and finishing (F1, F2, and F3) for both PT and PTU instruments were employed. Tip angle, instrument diameter at each millimeter, and cross-sectional area at 3 mm from the tip were the dimensional parameters measured. Flexibility and torsional strength of each instrument (n = 12) were assessed according to specification ISO 3630-1. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (alpha = 0.05). Flexibility increased for S1 and F1 PTU instruments and decreased for F2 and F3, whereas torsional resistance increased for S2, F2, and F3. Changes in tip angle were accompanied by variation of tip geometry in all instruments. (J Endod 2009;35:113-116)en
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)-
dc.description.sponsorshipBelo Horizonte, MG, Brazi-
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)-
dc.format.extent113-116-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectFlexibilityen
dc.subjectNiTi rotary instrumentsen
dc.subjectProTaperen
dc.subjectProTaper Universalen
dc.subjecttorsional resistanceen
dc.titleFlexibility and Torsional Strength of ProTaper and ProTaper Universal Rotary Instruments Assessed by Mechanical Testsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Dept Met & Mat Engn, Sch Engn, BR-30160030 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv State São Paulo UNESP, Sch Dent Araraquara, Dept Restorat Dent, Araraquara, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Dept Restorat Dent, Fac Dent, BR-30160030 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv State São Paulo UNESP, Sch Dent Araraquara, Dept Restorat Dent, Araraquara, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2008.10.006-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000262140700024-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Endodontics-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.