You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/16769
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSouza, E. M.-
dc.contributor.authorBretas, R. T.-
dc.contributor.authorCenci, M. S.-
dc.contributor.authorMaia-Filho, E. M.-
dc.contributor.authorBonetti-Filho, I.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:47:12Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:00:42Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:47:12Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:00:42Z-
dc.date.issued2008-08-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01410.x-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Endodontic Journal. Malden: Wiley-blackwell, v. 41, n. 8, p. 658-663, 2008.-
dc.identifier.issn0143-2885-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/16769-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/16769-
dc.description.abstractAim To evaluate differences between anatomic and radiographic measurements of root canal wall thickness (RCWT) after each root canal preparation stage during post placement.Methodology Twenty mandibular premolars with a single canal were decoronated and the roots embedded in resin using a teflon muffle. Roots were sectioned horizontally at a pre-established level and canals were prepared for post placement. Endodontic hand files were used for root canal preparation, followed by Gates Glidden drills and Peeso reamers. Standardized radiographs and photographs at pre-established measurement levels were taken before preparation, after root canal instrumentation, after Gates Glidden preparation and after Peeso enlargement. All images were digitized and RCWT at the mesial and distal walls measured (IMAGETOOL 3.0). Differences between radiographic and anatomic measurements were analysed with paired t-tests. ANOVA was used to compare the percentages of radiographic distortions.Results Regardless of the time-point evaluated, RCWT determined by radiographs were greater than the respective anatomic measurements (P < 0.05). The difference detected at each stage was similar and constant (P > 0.05).Conclusions Throughout preparation for post placement, radiographic images overestimated the RCWT by approximately 25%, regardless of the clinical stage evaluated.en
dc.format.extent658-663-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectpost preparationen
dc.subjectradiographic imagesen
dc.subjectroot canal wall thicknessen
dc.titlePeriapical radiographs overestimate root canal wall thickness during post space preparationen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Ctr Maranhao UNICEUMA-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Ctr Maranhao UNICEUMA, Sao Luis, MA, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Araraquara Dent Sch, Araraquara, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Campinas, Fac Dent Piracicaba, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Araraquara Dent Sch, Araraquara, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01410.x-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000257484500003-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Endodontic Journal-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.