You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/17799
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGiaquinto, Percilia Cardoso-
dc.contributor.authorHoffmann, Anette-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:49:54Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:02:13Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:49:54Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:02:13Z-
dc.date.issued2010-01-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10164-009-0150-3-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Ethology. Tokyo: Springer Tokyo, v. 28, n. 1, p. 21-27, 2010.-
dc.identifier.issn0289-0771-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/17799-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/17799-
dc.description.abstractExperiments were performed to investigate senses that are essential for mediating fright reaction and food behavior in Pseudoplatystoma corruscans, pintado. The dilemma "to feed or to flee" was also analyzed in fishes with intact and sectioned olfactory tracts, stimulated by alarm substance extracts and food. Fishes were arranged into five groups: fish with intact lateral olfactory tracts (LOT), fish with intact medial olfactory tract (MOT), fish with tracts totally sectioned (TOTAL, both LOT and MOT), sham operated, and nonoperated fish. The five groups were submitted to either alarm substance extract and food stimulus or to distilled water (control) and food stimulus. Fish reacted to food independently of which tract (LOT, MOT or TOTAL) was sectioned; vision seems necessary and elemental to detect and deflagrate food response. Latency of the responses to each reaction was different between groups. None of the fish with sectioned tracts reacted to alarm substance extract, while sham- and nonoperated fish showed the typical alarm behavior response, leading to the conclusion that olfaction is essential for mediating alarm response. These results indicate that others sense systems (e.g., vision) are sufficient to trigger and elicit feeding behavior and that olfaction is not necessary to fully maintain food detection to qualitative and quantitative extent. However, olfactory tract integrity seems to be required for mediation of alarm reaction in P. corruscans.en
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)-
dc.format.extent21-27-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherSpringer Tokyo-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectFishen
dc.subjectOlfactionen
dc.subjectOlfactory tracten
dc.subjectFeeding behavioren
dc.subjectAlarm reactionen
dc.subjectAlarm substanceen
dc.titleRole of olfaction and vision cues in feeding behavior and alarm reaction in the catfish pintado, Pseudoplatystoma corruscansen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.description.affiliationState Univ São Paulo, UNESP, Dept Physiol, Inst Biol Sci, BR-17618000 Botucatu, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv São Paulo, Dept Physiol, Fac Med, BR-09500900 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespState Univ São Paulo, UNESP, Dept Physiol, Inst Biol Sci, BR-17618000 Botucatu, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10164-009-0150-3-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000273033200004-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Ethology-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.