You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/18932
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKatagiri, S.-
dc.contributor.authorOliveira-Sequeira, T. C. G.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:53:05Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:03:48Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:53:05Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:03:48Z-
dc.date.issued2010-10-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2010.04.027-
dc.identifier.citationExperimental Parasitology. San Diego: Academic Press Inc. Elsevier B.V., v. 126, n. 2, p. 214-216, 2010.-
dc.identifier.issn0014-4894-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/18932-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/18932-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of present study was to compare the efficiency of a commercial assay and two conventional methods for fecal concentration in detecting canine gastrointestinal parasites. Fecal samples from 254 dogs were processed by centrifugation-sedimentation (CS), centrifugation-flotation (CF) and a commercial assay for fecal concentration (TF-test (R)). The following parasites were detected: Ancylostoma (37.8%), Giardia (16.9%), Toxocara canis (8.7%), Trichuris vulpis (7.1%), Isospora (3.5%), and Sarcocystis (2.7%). The calculated analytical sensitivity indicated that CF was more accurate (P < 0.01) in detecting Ancylostoma, T. canis, T. vulpis and Giardia infections. However, CF showed significantly higher sensitivity only for Ancylostoma, compared to the other two methods. The kappa index value of diagnostic agreement between TF-test and CF was high for T. canis (83%) and moderate for Giardia (72%) and Ancylostoma (63%). The advantages and limitations of each method were assessed for individual diagnosis and epidemiological investigation. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.format.extent214-216-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherAcademic Press Inc. Elsevier B.V.-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectIntestinal parasitesen
dc.subjectDiagnosisen
dc.subjectCoprological methodsen
dc.subjectDogsen
dc.titleComparison of three concentration methods for the recovery of canine intestinal parasites from stool samplesen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUNESP, Dept Parasitol, Inst Biociencias, BR-18618000 Botucatu, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP, Dept Parasitol, Inst Biociencias, BR-18618000 Botucatu, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.exppara.2010.04.027-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000280885500017-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofExperimental Parasitology-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.