You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/20787
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorda Rocha Diz, Maria Caroline-
dc.contributor.authorMauerberg-deCastro, Eliane-
dc.contributor.authorRomani, Maria Fernanda-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:48:50Z-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:58:31Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:06:58Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:48:50Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:58:31Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:06:58Z-
dc.date.issued2012-12-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2012.07.001-
dc.identifier.citationInfant Behavior & Development. New York: Elsevier B.V., v. 35, n. 4, p. 645-654, 2012.-
dc.identifier.issn0163-6383-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/20787-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/20787-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to determine whether or not blind children perseverate during a modified Piagetian A-not-B reaching task, with conditions that employ luminous AB targets and acoustic AB targets. Ten congenitally blind children, ages 1-4 years, with residual vision for light, took part in this study. Behavioral and kinematic data were computed for participants' reaches, performed in six A trials and in two B trials, in both stimulus conditions. All of the children perseverated in the luminous condition, and none of them perseverated in the condition using acoustic targets. The children tilted their heads in the direction of the target as they reached towards it. However, this coupling action (head-reaching) occurred predominantly in the A trials in the acoustic condition. In the luminous condition, in contrast to the acoustic condition, the children took longer times to initiate the reaching movement. Also, in the luminous condition, the children explored the target surroundings, unlike the acoustic condition, in which they reached straight ahead. For these blind children, sound was more relevant to reaching than was the luminous stimulus. The luminous input caused perseveration in congenitally blind children in a similar way that has been reported in the literature for typically-developing, sighted infants, ages 8-12 months, performing A-not-B tasks with visual inputs. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.format.extent645-654-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectMotor perseverationen
dc.subjectA-not-B erroren
dc.subjectBlindnessen
dc.titlePerseveration in congenitally blind children: Effects of luminous and acoustic targets on a modified A-not-B tasken
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionColl Eisntein-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Lab Act & Percept, Dept Phys Educ, BR-13506900 Rio Claro, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationColl Eisntein, Limeira, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Lab Act & Percept, Dept Phys Educ, BR-13506900 Rio Claro, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.infbeh.2012.07.001-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000312179100004-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofInfant Behavior & Development-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.