You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/20812
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGoncalves, Mauro-
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Nise R.-
dc.contributor.authorHallal, Camilla Zamfolini-
dc.contributor.authorvan Dieen, Jaap H.-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:48:57Z-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:58:35Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:07:01Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:48:57Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:58:35Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:07:01Z-
dc.date.issued2011-01-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3233/BMR-2011-0297-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. Amsterdam: IOS Press, v. 24, n. 4, p. 209-214, 2011.-
dc.identifier.issn1053-8127-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/20812-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/20812-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Hand-held flexible poles which are brought into oscillation to cause alternating forces on trunk, are advocated as training devices that are supposed to solicit increased levels of stabilizing trunk muscle activity. The aim of this study was to verify this claim by comparing electromyographic (EMG) activity of trunk muscles during exercises performed with a flexible pole and a rigid pole.Methods: Twelve healthy females performed three different exercises with flexible and rigid poles. EMG activity of iliocostalis lumborum (IL), multifidus (MU), rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique (EO) and internal oblique (IO), and was continuously measured. The EMG signals were analyzed in time domain by calculation of the Root Mean Square (RMS) amplitudes over 250 ms windows. The mean RMS-values over time were normalized by the maximum RMS obtained for each muscle.Results: The IO showed a 72% greater EMG activity during the exercises performed with the flexible pole than with the rigid pole (p = 0.035). In exercises performed in standing, the IO was significantly more active than when sitting (p = 0.006).Conclusion: As intended, the cyclic forces induced by the oscillating pole did increase trunk muscle activation. However, the effect was limited and significant for the IO muscle only.en
dc.format.extent209-214-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherIOS Press-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectElectromyographyen
dc.subjectspineen
dc.subjectstabilityen
dc.subjectexercisesen
dc.titleElectromyographic activity of trunk muscles during exercises with flexible and non-flexible polesen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionVrije Univ Amsterdam-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Biosci Inst, Dept Phys Educ, Rio Claro, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Fac Sci & Technol, Dept Phys Therapy, Presidente Prudente, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationVrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Human Movement Sci, Res Inst MOVE, Amsterdam, Netherlands-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Biosci Inst, Dept Phys Educ, Rio Claro, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Fac Sci & Technol, Dept Phys Therapy, Presidente Prudente, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/BMR-2011-0297-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000297862700003-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.