You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/21203
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Fernando Rodrigues-
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida-Neto, Mario-
dc.contributor.authorMendonca do Prado, Vitor Hugo-
dc.contributor.authorBaptista Haddad, Celio Fernando-
dc.contributor.authorRossa-Feres, Denise de Cerqueira-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:59:58Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:07:42Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:59:58Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:07:42Z-
dc.date.issued2012-09-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02726.x-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Biogeography. Hoboken: Wiley-blackwell, v. 39, n. 9, p. 1720-1732, 2012.-
dc.identifier.issn0305-0270-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/21203-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/21203-
dc.description.abstractAim The diversity of reproductive modes among amphibians constitutes a striking example of how differences in the biology of species provide important explanations for species distribution patterns on a broad scale. We hypothesize that sites with a higher humidity level will support more modes of reproduction than drier sites and will consequently exhibit a higher phylogenetic diversity. Furthermore, if there is a gradient in the tolerance of reproductive modes to desiccation, there will be a nested pattern in the composition of reproductive modes among sites. Location Twenty-seven forest sites in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Methods Through a path analysis approach, we evaluated the direct and indirect effects of the humidity level on the number of reproductive modes, as well as the relative importance of both variables on amphibian phylogenetic diversity. A nestedness analysis was used to quantify the extent to which the compositions of both species and reproductive modes in drier sites correspond to subsets of those in sites with higher annual precipitation. Results We found that the reproductive modes present in drier sites are non-random subsets of those present in sites with higher humidity levels. Because reproductive modes are phylogenetically conserved among amphibians, sites with a greater number of reproductive modes supported greater phylogenetic diversity. Sites with high precipitation throughout the year provided suitable environmental conditions for a larger number of reproductive modes, whereas sites with low precipitation and typical seasonal climates supported only those reproductive modes specialized to resist desiccation. Main conclusions Our results show that humidity-related variables are key environmental factors related to both the richness of reproductive modes and phylogenetic diversity. Our results support the hypothesis that the higher phylogenetic diversity found in moister sites reflects differences in the tolerance to desiccation among different reproductive modes. Given that reproductive modes are associated with susceptibility to desiccation, their incorporation into explanatory models may trigger a significant advance in the understanding of the mechanisms regulating the species richness and composition of amphibian communities.en
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)-
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)-
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)-
dc.format.extent1720-1732-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectAmphibian diversityen
dc.subjectanuransen
dc.subjectAtlantic Foresten
dc.subjectbiodiversityen
dc.subjectbiogeographyen
dc.subjectBrazilen
dc.subjectconservationen
dc.subjecthumidityen
dc.subjectprecipitationen
dc.titleHumidity levels drive reproductive modes and phylogenetic diversity of amphibians in the Brazilian Atlantic Foresten
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), UFSCar, Dept Ciencias Ambientais, BR-18052780 Sorocaba, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Dept Ecol, Inst Ciencias Biol, BR-74001970 Goiania, Go, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUNESP, Dept Zool, Inst Biociencias, BR-13506900 Rio Claro, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Zool & Bot, São Paulo, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP, Dept Zool, Inst Biociencias, BR-13506900 Rio Claro, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Zool & Bot, São Paulo, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 07/50738-5-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCAPES: 1186/09-4-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 06/51534-1-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 10/50125-6-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 11/20677-0-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 08/50928-1-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 04/04820-3-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02726.x-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000307562200016-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Biogeography-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.