You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/22595
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOno, Evelise-
dc.contributor.authorMedici Filho, Edmundo-
dc.contributor.authorLeite, Horacio Faig-
dc.contributor.authorOshiro Tanaka, Jefferson Luis-
dc.contributor.authorLeonelli de Moraes, Mari Eli-
dc.contributor.authorDe Melo Castilho, Julio Cezar-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T14:04:24Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:10:09Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T14:04:24Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:10:09Z-
dc.date.issued2011-03-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.046-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. New York: Mosby-elsevier, v. 139, n. 3, p. 324-333, 2011.-
dc.identifier.issn0889-5406-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/22595-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/22595-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Root resorption can cause damage in orthodontic patients. Digital subtraction radiography (DSR) is a useful resource for the detection of mineral losses. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of digital radiography (DR) and DSR in detecting simulated external root resorption. Examiner agreement between the 2 techniques was also evaluated. Methods: Root resorptions of various sizes were simulated on the apical and lingual aspects of 49 teeth from 9 dry human mandibles. The teeth were radiographed in standardized conditions. The radiographs were registered with Regeemy Image Registration and Mosaicking (version 0.2.43-RCB, DPI-INPE, Sao Jose dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil) and subtracted with Image Tool (University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio). The subtracted images and the digital radiographs were evaluated by 3 oral radiologists. Results: No statistically significant differences were found for the methods in the detection of apical root resorptions, independently from lesion size, and of lingual resorptions of 1.2 mm or greater. DSR was significantly better than DR for detection of lingual resorptions up to 1 mm. Resorptions less than 0.5 mm were not precisely detected by either method. DSR provided better intraexaminer and interexaminer agreement than did DR. Conclusions: Both methods are precise for detection of apical root resorptions as small as 0.5 mm and lingual resorptions of 1 mm or more. However, DSR frequently performed better than did DR. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:324-33)en
dc.format.extent324-333-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherMosby-elsevier-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.titleEvaluation of simulated external root resorptions with digital radiography and digital subtraction radiographyen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Sao Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, Dept Oral Diag & Surg, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Sao Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, Dept Biosci & Oral Diagnost, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Sao Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, Dept Oral Diag & Surg, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Sao Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, Dept Biosci & Oral Diagnost, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.046-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000288158100023-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.