Você está no menu de acessibilidade

Utilize este identificador para citar ou criar um link para este item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/22664
Registro de metadados completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, Janete Dias-
dc.contributor.authorLima, Celina Faig-
dc.contributor.authorBrandão, Adriana Aigotti Haberbeck-
dc.contributor.authorGuimaraes Cabral, Luiz Antonio-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T14:04:35Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:10:17Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T14:04:35Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:10:17Z-
dc.date.issued2008-11-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000325624-
dc.identifier.citationActa Cytologica. St Louis: Sci Printers & Publ Inc, v. 52, n. 6, p. 697-701, 2008.-
dc.identifier.issn0001-5547-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/22664-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/22664-
dc.description.abstractObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of Papanicolaou, hematoxylin-eosin (H-E), Leishman and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining for Cytologic diagnosis of oral lesions.Study DesignPatients from the Discipline of Stomatology, Sao Jose dos Campos Dental School, from the wards of Hospital Heliopolis and from the dentistry outpatient clinic of the University Hospital, University of São Paulo Medical School, with the following diseases, were selected: erythematous candidiasis (n = 9), pseudomembranous candidiasis (n = 10), squamous cell carcinoma In = 19), herpes simplex (n = 8), paracoccidioidomycosis In = 8) and pemphigus vulgaris (n = 1).ResultsThe different staining methods were compared regarding the quality of definition of cytoplasmic and nuclear morphologic characteristics and the identification of bacteria, fungi, inflammatory cells and secretions. Papanicolaou and H-E staining were considered better methods. In cases of fungal infections, PAS staining is useful and should be applied as a complementary method.ConclusionWithin the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the cytologic diagnosis of oral lesions along with different staining methods is a useful tool for oral diagnosis. (Acta Cytol 2008;52:697-701)en
dc.format.extent697-701-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherSci Printers & Publ Inc-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectcandidiasis, oralen
dc.subjectcarcinoma, squamous cellen
dc.subjectcytologyen
dc.subjectdiagnosis, oralen
dc.subjectherpes simplexen
dc.subjectparacoccidioidomycosisen
dc.subjectpemphigusen
dc.titleEvaluation of Staining Methods for Cytologic Diagnosis of Oral Lesionsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Sao Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, Dept Biosci & Oral Diag, BR-12245000 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Sao Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, Postgraduat Program Oral Biopathol, BR-12245000 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Sao Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, Dept Biosci & Oral Diag, BR-12245000 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Sao Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, Postgraduat Program Oral Biopathol, BR-12245000 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000325624-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000260986400009-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofActa Cytologica-
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

Não há nenhum arquivo associado com este item.
 

Itens do Acervo digital da UNESP são protegidos por direitos autorais reservados a menos que seja expresso o contrário.