You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/22808
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLombardo, Geraldo H. L.-
dc.contributor.authorNishioka, Renato S.-
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Rodrigo O. A.-
dc.contributor.authorMichida, Silvia M. A.-
dc.contributor.authorKojima, Alberto N.-
dc.contributor.authorMesquita, Alfredo M. M.-
dc.contributor.authorBuso, Leonardo-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T14:05:02Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:10:32Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T14:05:02Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:10:32Z-
dc.date.issued2010-02-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00546.x-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Prosthodontics-implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry. Malden: Wiley-blackwell, v. 19, n. 2, p. 103-111, 2010.-
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/22808-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/22808-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the influence of surface treatment on the shear bond strength between a Co-Cr alloy and two ceramics.Materials and Methods: Forty-eight metal cylinders were made (thickness: 4 mm, height: 3.7 mm) according ISO TR 11405. The 48 metallic cylinders were divided into four groups (n = 12), according to the veneering ceramic (StarLight Ceram and Duceram Kiss) and surface treatments: air-particle abrasion with Al(2)O(3) or tungsten drill (W). Gr1: StarLight + Al(2)O(3); Gr2: StarLight + W; Gr3: Duceram + Al(2)O(3); and Gr4: Duceram + W. The specimens were aged using thermal cycling (3000 x, 5 to 55 degrees C, dwell time: 30 seconds, transfer time: 2 seconds). The shear test was performed with a universal testing machine, using a load cell of 100 kg (speed: 0.5 mm/min) and a specific device. The bond strength data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test (5%), and the failure modes were analyzed using an optical microscope (30x).Results: The means and standard deviations of the shear bond strengths were (MPa): G1 (57.97 +/- 11.34); G2 (40.62 +/- 12.96); G3 (47.09 +/- 13.19); and G4 (36.80 +/- 8.86). Ceramic (p = 0.03252) and surface treatment (p = 0.0002) significantly affected the mean bond strength values.Conclusions: Air-particle abrasion with Al(2)O(3) improved the shear bond strength between metal and ceramics used.en
dc.format.extent103-111-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectShear bond strengthen
dc.subjectmetal-ceramic systemen
dc.subjectsurface treatmenten
dc.titleInfluence of Surface Treatment on the Shear Bond Strength of Ceramics Fused to Cobalt-Chromiumen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Paulista-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), Dept Restorat Dent, BR-58059900 Joao Pessoa, Paraiba, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, UNESP, Sao Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, UNESP, Sao Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, Dept Prosthodont, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Paulista, Dent Sch UNIP, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, UNESP, Sao Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, UNESP, Sao Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, Dept Prosthodont, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00546.x-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000290115200005-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthodontics-implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.