You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/22822
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDe Vasconcellos, Diego Klee-
dc.contributor.authorOezcan, Mutlu-
dc.contributor.authorMaziero Volpato, Claudia Angela-
dc.contributor.authorBottino, Marco Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorYener, Esra Salihoglu-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T14:05:04Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:10:33Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T14:05:04Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:10:33Z-
dc.date.issued2012-06-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3182566e59-
dc.identifier.citationImplant Dentistry. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 21, n. 3, p. 225-229, 2012.-
dc.identifier.issn1056-6163-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/22822-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/22822-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study investigated the effect of porcelain firing on the misfit of implant-supported frameworks and analyzed the influence of preheat treatment on the dimensional alterations.Materials and Methods: Four external-hex cylindrical implants were placed in polyurethane block. Ten frameworks of screw-retained implant-supported prostheses were cast in Pd-Ag using 2 procedures: (1) control group (CG, n = 5): cast in segments and laser welded; and test group (TG, n = 5): cast in segments, preheated, and laser welded. All samples were subjected to firing to simulate porcelain veneering firing. Strain gauges were bonded around the implants, and microstrain values (mu epsilon = 10(-6)epsilon) were recorded after welding (M1), oxidation cycle (M2), and glaze firing (M3). Data were statistically analyzed (2-way analysis of variance, Bonferroni, alpha = 0.05).Results: The microstrain value in the CG at M3 (475.2 mu epsilon) was significantly different from the values observed at M1 (355.6 mu epsilon) and M2 (413.9 mu epsilon). The values at M2 and M3 in the CG were not statistically different. Microstrain values recorded at different moments (M1: 361.6 mu epsilon/M2: 335.3 mu epsilon/M3: 307.2 mu epsilon) did not show significant difference.Conclusions: The framework misfit deteriorates during firing cycles of porcelain veneering. Metal distortion after porcelain veneering could be controlled by preheat treatment. (Implant Dent 2012;21:225-229)en
dc.format.extent225-229-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectosseointegrationen
dc.subjectstrain gaugeen
dc.subjectdental prosthesis designen
dc.titleStrain Gauge Analysis of the Effect of Porcelain Firing Simulation on the Prosthetic Misfit of Implant-Supported Frameworksen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Zurich-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Yeditepe-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Zurich, Clin Fixed & Removable Prosthodont & Dent Mat Sci, Ctr Dent & Oral Med, Dent Mat Unit, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Dent, BR-88040900 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUNESP São Paulo State Univ, Sao Jose dos Campos Sch Dent, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Yeditepe, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Istanbul, Turkey-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP São Paulo State Univ, Sao Jose dos Campos Sch Dent, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/ID.0b013e3182566e59-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000304318400013-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofImplant Dentistry-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.