You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/22920
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBarcellos, Daphne Camara-
dc.contributor.authorBatista, Graziela Ribeiro-
dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Melissa Aline-
dc.contributor.authorRangel, Patricia Maria-
dc.contributor.authorGomes Torres, Carlos Rocha-
dc.contributor.authorFava, Marcelo-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T14:05:19Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:10:44Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T14:05:19Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:10:44Z-
dc.date.issued2011-06-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a19224-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Adhesive Dentistry. Hanover Park: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, v. 13, n. 3, p. 261-265, 2011.-
dc.identifier.issn1461-5185-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/22920-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/22920-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the bond strength of indirect restorations to dentin using self-adhesive cements with and without the application of adhesive systems.Material and Methods: Seventy-two bovine incisors were used, in which the buccal surfaces were ground down to expose an area of dentin measuring a minimum of 4 x 4 mm. The indirect resin composite Resilab was used to make 72 blocks, which were cemented onto the dentin surface of the teeth and divided into 4 groups (n = 18): group 1: self-adhesive resin cement BiFix SE, applied according to manufacturer's recommendations; group 2: self-adhesive resin cement RelyX Unicem, used according to manufacturer's recommendations; group 3: etch-and-rinse Solobond M adhesive system + BiFix SE; group 4: etch-and-rinse Single Bond 2 adhesive system + RelyX Unicem. The specimens were sectioned into sticks and subjected to microtensile testing in a universal testing machine (EMIC DL-200MF). Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha = 5%).Results: The mean values (+/- standard deviation) obtained for the groups were: group 1: 15.28 (+/- 8.17)(a), group 2: 14.60 (+/- 5.21)(a), group 3: 39.20 (+/- 9.98)(c), group 4: 27.59 (+/- 6.57)(b). Different letters indicate significant differences (ANOVA; p = 0.0000).Conclusion: The application of adhesive systems before self-adhesive cements significantly increased the bond strength to dentin. In group 2, RelyX Unicem associated with the adhesive system Single Bond 2 showed significantly lower mean tensile bond strengths than group 3 (BiFix SE associated with the etch-and-rinse Solobond M adhesive system).en
dc.format.extent261-265-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Inc-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectdentinen
dc.subjectstrengthen
dc.subjectself-adhesive cementsen
dc.titleEvaluation of Bond Strength of Self-adhesive Cements to Dentin With or Without Application of Adhesive Systemsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sao Jose dos Campos Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, BR-12245000 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sao Jose dos Campos Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, BR-12245000 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.3290/j.jad.a19224-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000292068500011-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Adhesive Dentistry-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.