You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/22923
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGomes Torres, Carlos Rocha-
dc.contributor.authorBarcellos, Daphne Camara-
dc.contributor.authorPucci, Cesar Rogerio-
dc.contributor.authorGouvea Lima, Gabriela de Morais-
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Cristiana Martins-
dc.contributor.authorSiviero, Mariana-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T14:05:20Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:10:44Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T14:05:20Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:10:44Z-
dc.date.issued2009-08-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a17074-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Adhesive Dentistry. Hanover Park: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, v. 11, n. 4, p. 279-286, 2009.-
dc.identifier.issn1461-5185-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/22923-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/22923-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To assess the influence of variations in the application technique of self-etching adhesive systems on the adhesive bond strength to enamel.Materials and Methods: One hundred thirty bovine teeth were used and divided into 13 groups. The teeth were embedded in acrylic resin, ground until a flat enamel area was exposed, and polished with 600-grit abrasive paper. The self-etching adhesive systems One Up Bond F, Clearfil SE Bond, Self & Etch were used, and the conventional adhesive Magic Bond and acid etching were used as the control group. One or two layers of the self-etching systems were actively or passively applied. Composite cylinders were made over the bonding area. The samples were submitted to shear bond testing at a speed of 1 mm/min. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's test at a 5% level of significance.Results: Significant variations were observed for the factors type of adhesive (p = 0.001, F = 193,3594, df = 3) and application technique (p = 0.001, F = 29,9119, df = 1). No significant interaction was found between the two factors (p = 0.08). The adhesives Clearfil SE Bond and One Up Bond F presented significantly higher adhesive bond strength means than Self & Etch. The active application of two layers resulted in higher bond strength means than the other techniques.Conclusion: The application technique had a significant influence on adhesive bond strength to enamel.en
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)-
dc.format.extent279-286-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Inc-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectself-etching adhesivesen
dc.subjectenamelen
dc.subjectbond strengthen
dc.titleInfluence of Methods of Application of Self-etching Adhesive Systems on Adhesive Bond Strength to Enamelen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Sao Jose dos Campos Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, BR-12245000 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Sao Jose dos Campos Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, BR-12245000 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 03/13463-7-
dc.identifier.doi10.3290/j.jad.a17074-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000269255600004-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Adhesive Dentistry-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.