You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/22977
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFreire Martins Lemos, Leticia Vargas-
dc.contributor.authorFelizardo, Klissia Romero-
dc.contributor.authorMyaki, Silvio Issao-
dc.contributor.authorLopes, Murilo Baena-
dc.contributor.authorMoura, Sandra Kiss-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T14:05:28Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:10:48Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T14:05:28Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:10:48Z-
dc.date.issued2012-11-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2011.01213.x-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. Hoboken: Wiley-blackwell, v. 22, n. 6, p. 435-441, 2012.-
dc.identifier.issn0960-7439-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/22977-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/22977-
dc.description.abstractInternational Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 2012; 22: 435441 Background. Hydrophilic adhesives may be used as pit and fissure sealants (sealants), but there is concern about the ability of self-etching adhesives to bond sealants to enamel. Aim. To study the bond strength (BS) and morphology of adhesive systems used as sealants. Design. OptiBond FL, OptiBond All-in-One, combined OptiBond All-in-One + OptiBond FL adhesive, and Fluroshield were applied to the occlusal surfaces of 16 primary molars (n = 4). Teeth were stored in distilled water (24 h at 37 degrees C) and sectioned through the interface to obtain sticks (0.8 mm2) tested under a tensile load (0.5 mm/min). Failure modes were observed. Data were analysed by ANOVA and Tukeys tests (a = 5%). The morphology of 12 primary molars was examined in terms of the etching pattern and resin reproduction. Results. Differences in the BS were found (P = 0.001), with OptiBond FL showing the highest (36.84 +/- 5.7 MPa), Fluroshield (24.26 +/- 2.13 MPa) and OptiBond All-in-One (17.12 +/- 4.97 MPa) similar, and OptiBond All-in-One + OptiBond FL adhesive the lowest (9.8 +/- 2.94 MPA). OptiBond FL showed the best results in terms of morphology. Conclusion. Under the conditions of this study, OptiBond FL was the best material to be used for sealing.en
dc.format.extent435-441-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.titleBond strength and morphology of resin materials applied to the occlusal surface of primary molarsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Norte Parana-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Norte Parana, Sch Dent, Londrina, PR, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Sch Dent, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Sch Dent, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-263X.2011.01213.x-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000309187900005-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Paediatric Dentistry-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.