You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCoutinho, FAB-
dc.contributor.authorKiang, D.-
dc.contributor.authorNogami, Y.-
dc.contributor.authorTomio, L.-
dc.identifier.citationCanadian Journal of Physics. Ottawa: Natl Research Council Canada, v. 80, n. 8, p. 837-845, 2002.-
dc.description.abstractDirac's hole theory and quantum field theory are usually considered equivalent to each other. The equivalence, however, does not necessarily hold, as we discuss in terms of models of a certain type. We further suggest that the equivalence may fail in more general models. This problem is closely related to the validity of the Pauli principle in intermediate states of perturbation theory.en
dc.publisherNatl Research Council Canada-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.titleDirac's hole theory versus quantum field theoryen
dc.contributor.institutionMcMaster Univ-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.contributor.institutionDalhousie Univ-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationMcMaster Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Hamilton, ON L8S 4M1, Canada-
dc.description.affiliationUniv São Paulo, Fac Med, BR-01246903 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationDalhousie Univ, Dept Phys, Halifax, NS B3H 3J5, Canada-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Inst Fis Teor, BR-01405900 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Inst Fis Teor, BR-01405900 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofCanadian Journal of Physics-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.