Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/23555
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Accioly, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Dias, M. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-05-20T14:07:03Z | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-10-25T17:12:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-05-20T14:07:03Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-10-25T17:12:20Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006-01-30 | - |
dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X06025511 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Modern Physics A. Singapore: World Scientific Publ Co Pte Ltd, v. 21, n. 3, p. 559-573, 2006. | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0217-751X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23555 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/23555 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The addition of a topologically massive term to an admittedly nonunitary three-dimensional massive model, be it an electromagnetic system or a gravitational one, does not cure its nonunitarity. What about the enlargement of avowedly unitary massive models by way of a topologically massive term? the electromagnetic models remain unitary after the topological augmentation but, surprisingly enough, the gravitational ones have their unitarity spoiled. Here we analyze these issues and present the explanation why unitary massive gravitational models, unlike unitary massive electromagnetic ones, cannot coexist from the viewpoint of unitarity with topologically massive terms. We also discuss the novel features of the three-term effective field models that are gauge-invariant. | en |
dc.format.extent | 559-573 | - |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.publisher | World Scientific Publ Co Pte Ltd | - |
dc.source | Web of Science | - |
dc.subject | topologically massive models | pt |
dc.subject | massive electromagnetic models | pt |
dc.subject | massive gravitational models | pt |
dc.subject | unitarity | pt |
dc.subject | effective field models | pt |
dc.title | Is it physically sound to add a topologically massive term to three-dimensional massive electromagnetic or gravitational models? | en |
dc.type | outro | - |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | - |
dc.description.affiliation | Univ Estadual Paulista, Inst Fis Teor, BR-01405000 São Paulo, SP, Brazil | - |
dc.description.affiliationUnesp | Univ Estadual Paulista, Inst Fis Teor, BR-01405000 São Paulo, SP, Brazil | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1142/S0217751X06025511 | - |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000236289000009 | - |
dc.rights.accessRights | Acesso restrito | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Modern Physics A | - |
Appears in Collections: | Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp |
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.