You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/24281
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAzevedo, F.-
dc.contributor.authorKraenkel, Roberto André-
dc.contributor.authorPamplona da Silva, D. J.-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:55:17Z-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T14:10:15Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:20:55Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:55:17Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T14:10:15Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:20:55Z-
dc.date.issued2012-09-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2012.06.001-
dc.identifier.citationEcological Complexity. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V., v. 11, p. 154-159, 2012.-
dc.identifier.issn1476-945X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/24281-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/24281-
dc.description.abstractA common situation observed in fragmented habitats is that species densities diminish within smaller fragments. Some species, however, do show an opposite tendency. We argue that release of competition between a strong competitor and a weak one is a plausible explanation for these different sensitivities to area reduction. We provide a quantitative model for competitive release caused by habitat limitation, solely based on the balance of diffusion and growth of the species. We show that in small habitat patches the stronger competitor has its density diminished, as opposite to the weaker competitor who, in a certain area range, has its density increased. We examine field data from an ecological experiment in Amazonia (BDFFP) which measured densities of two Amazonian rodents who showed opposite sensitivity to area reduction and we argue that our model explains the observations accurately. This implies that (i) area reduction is a strong factor determining densities of species in patches of habitat, regardless of considerations on degradation or edge effects and (ii) that species interactions have to be taken into account to explain sensitivity to size of the patches in ecological communities. We also discuss alternative explanations, such as predator release and effects due to imperfect isolation. Moreover, we stress the conceptual and mathematical simplicity of our model, which, nevertheless explains a phenomenon not yet well understood. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)-
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)-
dc.format.extent154-159-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectPatch sizeen
dc.subjectCompetitionen
dc.subjectExclusionen
dc.subjectCoexistenceen
dc.subjectDiffusionen
dc.subjectArea effectsen
dc.titleCompetitive release and area effectsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Alfenas (UNIFAL)-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista UNESP, Inst Fis Teor, BR-01140070 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Alfenas, BR-37701100 Pocos de Caldas, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista UNESP, Inst Fis Teor, BR-01140070 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecocom.2012.06.001-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000307684100017-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofEcological Complexity-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.