You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/26422
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFaria Filho, DE-
dc.contributor.authorTorres, KAA-
dc.contributor.authorFaria, DE-
dc.contributor.authorCampos, DMB-
dc.contributor.authorRosa, PS-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:07:13Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:42:01Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:07:13Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:42:01Z-
dc.date.issued2006-06-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2006000200004-
dc.identifier.citationRevista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, v. 8, n. 2, p. 89-98, 2006.-
dc.identifier.issn1516-635X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/26422-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/26422-
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated the efficacy of probiotic utilization as growth promoters in broiler chicken feeding using systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Thirty-five studies were recovered by the systematic review, 27 of which met the following criteria to be included in the meta-analysis: (1) Brazilian studies published between 1995 and 2005; (2) probiotics administered in the diet without growth promoter; (3) results included performance data with the respective coefficient of variation. Meta-analysis have shown that the probiotics promoted better weight gain and feed conversion than the negative control (no antimicrobial) in the initial phase (1 to 20-28 days); nevertheless, results were similar in the total period (1 to 35-48 days). Weight gain and feed conversion were similar between probiotics and the positive control (with antimicrobial) both in the initial and in the total periods. Viability in the total period improved with the use of probiotics in comparison to the negative or positive controls. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results of meta-analysis were coherent. The funnel plots and the Egger regression method evidenced that the studies published in Brazil do not present biased results. It is possible to conclude that the probiotics are a technically viable alternative to antimicrobial growth promoters in broiler feeding. Nevertheless, further studies are necessary to identify eventual differences among the probiotics commercially available in Brazil.en
dc.format.extent89-98-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherFundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas-
dc.sourceSciELO-
dc.subjectBirdsen
dc.subjectintestinal microfloraen
dc.subjectmicroorganismen
dc.subjectperformanceen
dc.titleProbiotics for broiler chickens in Brazil: systematic review and meta-analysisen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.contributor.institutionEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade do Contestado-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos-
dc.description.affiliationEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA) Suínos e Aves CNPSA-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade do Contestado-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias-
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1516-635X2006000200004-
dc.identifier.scieloS1516-635X2006000200004-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.fileS1516-635X2006000200004.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.