You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/32365
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPimentel, B. M.-
dc.contributor.authorTomazelli, J. L.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:21:11Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:54:32Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:21:11Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:54:32Z-
dc.date.issued1996-06-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTP.95.1217-
dc.identifier.citationProgress of Theoretical Physics. Kyoto: Kyoto Univ, v. 95, n. 6, p. 1217-1221, 1996.-
dc.identifier.issn0033-068X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/32365-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/32365-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we argue that there is no ambiguity between the Pauli-Villars and other methods of regularization in (2+1)-dimensional quantum electrodynamics with respect to dynamical mass generation, provided we properly choose the couplings for the regulators.en
dc.format.extent1217-1221-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherKyoto Univ-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.titleWhat is wrong with Pauli-Villars regularization in QED(3)?en
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUNIV ESTADUAL PAULISTA,INST FIS TEOR,RUA PAMPLONA 145,BR-01405900 SAO PAULO,BRAZIL-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNIV ESTADUAL PAULISTA,INST FIS TEOR,RUA PAMPLONA 145,BR-01405900 SAO PAULO,BRAZIL-
dc.identifier.doi10.1143/PTP.95.1217-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:A1996UV77400015-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofProgress of Theoretical Physics-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record Show full item record   View Statistics
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.