You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/33080
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCavalcanti, B. N.-
dc.contributor.authorLage-Marques, J. L.-
dc.contributor.authorRode, S. M.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:22:01Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:55:37Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:22:01Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:55:37Z-
dc.date.issued2003-11-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.022-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry. St Louis: Mosby, Inc., v. 90, n. 5, p. 447-451, 2003.-
dc.identifier.issn0022-3913-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/33080-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/33080-
dc.description.abstractStatement of problem. During tooth preparation, both high-speed handpieces and lasers generate heat, which, if not controlled, can cause pulpal necrosis.Purpose. The aim of this study was to compare temperature increases produced by a high-speed dental handpiece with those produced by a relatively new instrument, the Er:YAG (erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet) laser.Material and methods. Thirty bovine mandibular incisors were reduced to an enamel/dentin thickness of 2.5 mm. Class V preparations were completed to a depth of 2.0 mm, measured with a caliper or by a mark oil the burs. A thermocouple was placed inside the pulp chamber to determine temperature increases (degreesC). Analysis was performed on the following groups (n = 10): Group 1, high-speed handpiece without water cooling, Group 11, high-speed handpiece with water cooling (30 mL/min), and Group III, the noncontact Er:YAG laser (2.94 mum at 350 mJ/10 Hz) with water cooling (4.5 mL/min). The temperature increases were recorded by a computer linked to the thermocouples. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. The Dunn multiple comparison test was used as post hoc test (alpha = .05).Results. The average temperature rises were: 11.64degreesC (+/-4.35) for Group 1, 0.96degreesC (+/-0.71) for Group 11, and 2.69degreesC (+/-1.12) for Group III. There were no statistical differences between Groups 11 and III, both 11 and III differed from Group I significantly (P = .000 and P = .002, respectively).Conclusion. The preparations made with the high-speed and the laser instrument generated similar heat increases under water cooling. Water cooling was essential to avoid destructive temperature increases when using both the high-speed handpiece and laser.en
dc.format.extent447-451-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherMosby, Inc-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.titlePulpal temperature increases with Er : YAG laser and high-speed handpiecesen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.contributor.institutionIbirapuera Univ-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthet, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv São Paulo, Dept Operat Dent, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationIbirapuera Univ, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthet, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.022-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000186476900007-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.