You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/33176
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBerchielli, T. T.-
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez, N. M.-
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, H. P.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:22:07Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:55:47Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:22:07Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:55:47Z-
dc.date.issued1996-10-01-
dc.identifierhttp://cpro4576.publiccloud.com.br:8080/editora//upload/trabalho/v48/v48n5a10.pdf-
dc.identifier.citationArquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia. Minas Gerais: Arquivo Brasileiro Medicina Veterinaria Zootecnia, v. 48, n. 5, p. 607-617, 1996.-
dc.identifier.issn0102-0935-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/33176-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/33176-
dc.description.abstractThree steers equipped with ruminal and duodenal cannulas were fed roughage:concentrate ratios 80:20, 60:40 and 40:60 in order to study intake and apparent, rumen and post-rumen digestibilities. The roughage was ''coast cross'' (Cynodon dactylon) hay (5.67% CP and 83.30% NDF). Undigestible neutral detergent fiber (NDF) was used as dry matter (DM) flow marker. DM intake means were 77.99, 91.03 and 91.81g DM/kg BW0.75, for the 20, 40 and 60% concentrate diets, respectively. DM intake for the 20% diet was statistically (P < 0.05) different from the other two diets. Apparent digestion coefficient (%) of DM (50.48, 57.32 and 61.33), organic matter (OM) (52.03, 58.91 and 62.76) and gross energy (GE) (48.95, 56.40 and 60.00) increased significantly with the increase in concentrate ratio of the diets. For the following components the apparent digestion coefficients were not statistically different: NDF (44.54, 45.28 and 42.53), ADF (40.69 44.39 and 43.60), cellulose (51.54, 54.34 and 52.03), hemicellulose (49.63, 46.78 and 39.18) and starch (86.59, 91.89 and 93.21). DM, OM, NDF, ATF, cellulose and starch ruminal and post-ruminal digestibilities were not statistically different. But the ruminal digestibilities of hemicellulose (94.81, 90.26 and 85.99) and EG (93.85, 83.30 and 78.77) decreased significantly as the concentrate ratio of the diets increased. The post-ruminal digestibility of hemicellulose (5.19, 9.74 and 14.03%) and GE (6.12, 16.20 and 21.23%) increased as the concentrate ratio of the diets increased.en
dc.format.extent607-617-
dc.language.isopor-
dc.publisherArquivo Brasileiro Medicina Veterinaria Zootecnia-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectsteerpt
dc.subjectRúmenpt
dc.subjectduodenumpt
dc.subjectpartial digestibilitypt
dc.titleEfeito de diferentes relações volumoso: concentrado no consumo, digestibilidade aparente e partição da digestão da dieta de bovinospt
dc.title.alternativeEffect of different volume:concentration relations on intake, apparent digestibility and post-ruminal digestibility of bovine dietsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUFMG,ESCOLA VET,DEPT ZOOTECN,BELO HORIZONT,MG,BRAZIL-
dc.description.affiliationUFMG,ESCOLA VET,DEPT CLIN & CIRURGIA,BELO HORIZONT,MG,BRAZIL-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:A1996WP86700010-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.fileWOSA1996WP86700010.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofArquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.