You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/34211
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUrban, Vanessa M.-
dc.contributor.authorMachado, Ana Lucia-
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Regina V.-
dc.contributor.authorVergani, Carlos Eduardo-
dc.contributor.authorPavarina, Ana Claudia-
dc.contributor.authorCass, Quezia B.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:23:25Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:57:22Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:23:25Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:57:22Z-
dc.date.issued2007-03-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.021-
dc.identifier.citationDental Materials. Oxford: Elsevier B.V., v. 23, n. 3, p. 363-368, 2007.-
dc.identifier.issn0109-5641-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/34211-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/34211-
dc.description.abstractObjectives. This study compared the residual monomer (RM) in four hard chair-side reline resins (Duraliner II-D, Kooliner-K, Tokuso Rebase Fast-TRF and Ufi Gel hard-UGH) and one heat-polymerized denture base resin (Lucitone 550-L), which was processed using two polymerization cycles (short-LS and long-LL). It was also investigated the effect of two after polymerization treatments on this RM content.Methods. Specimens (n = 18) of each material were produced following the manufacturers' instructions and then divided into three groups. Group I specimens were left untreated (GI-control). Specimens of group II (GII) were given post-polymerization treatment by microwave irradiation. In group III (GIII), specimens were submitted to immersion in water at 55 degrees C (reline resins-10 min; denture base resin L-60min). The RM was analyzed using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and expressed as a percentage of RM. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (alpha = 0.05).Results. Comparing control specimens, statistical differences were found among all materials (p < 0.05), and the results can be arranged as K (1.52%) > D (0.85%) > UGH (0.45%) > LL (0.24%) > TRF (0.14%) > LS (0.08%). Immersion in hot water (GIII) promoted a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in the RM for all materials evaluated compared to control (GI), with the exception of LL specimens. Materials K, UGH and TRF exhibited significantly (p < 0.05) lower values of RM after microwave irradiation (GII) than in the control specimens.Significance. The reduction in RM promoted by water-bath and microwave post-polymerization treatments could improve the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of the relining and denture base materials. (c) 2006 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en
dc.format.extent363-368-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectacrylic resinpt
dc.subjectresidual monomerpt
dc.subjectpost-polymerization treatmentpt
dc.subjectHPLCpt
dc.titleResidual monomer of reline acrylic resins - Effect of water-bath and microwave post-polymerization treatmentsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Araraquara Dent Sch, BR-14801903 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSao Carlos Fed Univ, Dept Chem, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Araraquara Dent Sch, BR-14801903 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.021-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000244238700013-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofDental Materials-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.