You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/34747
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAmaral, C. M.-
dc.contributor.authorHara, A. T.-
dc.contributor.authorPimenta, LAF-
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, A. L.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:24:05Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:58:12Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:24:05Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:58:12Z-
dc.date.issued2001-02-01-
dc.identifierhttp://www.amjdent.com/previousarticles.htm-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Dentistry. San Antonio: Mosher & Linder, Inc., v. 14, n. 1, p. 31-33, 2001.-
dc.identifier.issn0894-8275-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/34747-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/34747-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To investigate the microleakage of four hydrophilic adhesive systems: one multiple-bottles (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus); two one-bottle (Single Bond, Stae); and one self-etching (Etch & Prime 3.0). Materials and Methods: 120 bovine incisor teeth were divided into four groups (n = 30) and Class V cavities were prepared at the cemento-enamel junction. The cavities were restored with the adhesive systems and with Z100 composite. The teeth were thermocycled 1,000 times between 5 +/- 2 degreesC and 55 +/- 2 degreesC with a dwell time of 1 min, and then placed in a 2% methylene blue dye (pH 7.0) for 4 hrs, washed and sectioned vertically through the center of the restorations. The qualitative evaluation was made by three examiners who distributed pre-established scores (0-4) for each tooth using a stereomicroscope at x30 magnification. Results: In enamel margins little microleakage was observed and the Kruskal-Wallis analysis did not show differences. In dentin margins the KruskaI-Wallis and multiple comparison analyses were applied: microleakage was significantly greater with Stae (median 3) and Scotchbond MP Plus (median 4). Single Bond (median 1) and Etch & Prime 3.0 (median 2) showed the best results in dentin margins, and the statistical analysis did not demonstrate differences in microleakage among these groups.en
dc.format.extent31-33-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherMosher & Linder, Inc-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.titleMicroleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in Class V composite restorationsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Campinas, UNICAMP, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Piracicaba, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationState Univ São Paulo, UNESP, Sch Dent Araraqara, Araraquara, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespState Univ São Paulo, UNESP, Sch Dent Araraqara, Araraquara, Brazil-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000168960800007-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Dentistry-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.