You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/34852
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorde Almeida, M. R.-
dc.contributor.authorHenriques, JFC-
dc.contributor.authorUrsi, W.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:24:12Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:58:21Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:24:12Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:58:21Z-
dc.date.issued2002-05-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.123037-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. St Louis: Mosby, Inc., v. 121, n. 5, p. 458-466, 2002.-
dc.identifier.issn0889-5406-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/34852-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/34852-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this investigation was to compare the dentoalveolar and skeletal cephalometric changes produced by the Frankel (FR-2) and bionator appliances in persons with Class 11 malocclusion. Lateral cephalograms were available for 66 patients of both sexes, who were divided into 3 groups of 22. The control group included untreated Class 11 children, with an initial mean age of 8 years 7 months; they were followed without treatment for 13 months. The FR-2 appliance group had an initial mean age of 9 years; those children were treated for a mean period of 17 months. The bionator group initially had a mean age of 10 years 8 months; on average, they were treated for 16 months. The results demonstrated no significant changes in maxillary growth during the evaluation period. Both appliances showed statistically significant increases in mandibular growth and mandibular protrusion, with greater increases in patients treated in the bionator group. Both experimental groups showed an improvement in the maxillomandibular relationship. There were no significant changes in growth direction, while the bionator group had a greater increase in posterior facial height. Both appliances produced similar labial tipping and protrusion of the lower incisors, lingual inclination, retrusion of the upper incisors, and a significant increase in mandibular posterior dentoalveolar height. The major treatment effects of bionator and FR-2 appliances were dentoalveolar, with a smaller, but significant, skeletal effect.en
dc.format.extent458-466-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherMosby, Inc-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.titleComparative study of the Frankel (FR-2) and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusionen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.contributor.institutionMethodist Univ Piracicaba-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniv São Paulo, Dept Orthodont, Bauru Dent Sch, BR-17012901 Bauru, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationMethodist Univ Piracicaba, Lins Dent Sch, Lins, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Dept Orthodont, Sao Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Dept Orthodont, Sao Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1067/mod.2002.123037-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000176194500006-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.