You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/35012
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBotega, D. M.-
dc.contributor.authorMesquita, M. F.-
dc.contributor.authorHenriques, GEP-
dc.contributor.authorVaz, Luis Geraldo-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:24:24Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T17:58:35Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:24:24Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T17:58:35Z-
dc.date.issued2004-09-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01308.x-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Oral Rehabilitation. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, v. 31, n. 9, p. 884-889, 2004.-
dc.identifier.issn0305-182X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/35012-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/35012-
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated retention force and fatigue resistance of two overdenture attachment systems. Twenty samples (O-ring and Bar-Clip) from two manufacturers (Conexao Sistemas de Protese and Lifecore Biomedical) were prepared and divided into four groups: (i) Conexao/O-ring; (ii) Conexao/Bar-Clip; (iii) Lifecore/O-ring and (iv) Lifecore/Bar-Clip, with five samples in each group. They were submitted to mechanical fatigue test using a servohydraulic machine performing 5500 cycles of insertion and removal (f=0.8 Hz), immersed in artificial saliva. Retention force values were obtained three times (0, 3000 and after 5500 cycles) simulating the clinical service, using a tensile strength at 1 mm min(-1) and load cell of 1 kN. Data were analysed with analysis of variance and Tukey's test at 5% level. Results showed that Conexao/Bar-Clip specimens had significantly higher retention values than Lifecore/Bar-Clip (44.61 and 18.44 N, respectively), Conexao/O-ring specimens had significantly lower values than Lifecore/O-ring (13.91 and 19.75 N, respectively). Conexao/Bar-Clip values were always significantly higher than those of Conexao/O-ring group (44.61 and 13.91 N, respectively). Lifecore (O-ring and Bar-Clip) presented similar values (19.75 and 18.44 N, respectively). The systems evaluated showed satisfactory retention force values, before and after fatigue testing. Conexao/Bar-Clip specimens presented the highest values. A 5-year simulation of insertion and removal did not decrease retention values or fracture components.en
dc.format.extent884-889-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectoverdenturespt
dc.subjectattachmentspt
dc.subjectosseointegrated implantspt
dc.subjectmechanical propertiespt
dc.subjectfatigue strengthpt
dc.subjectretentionpt
dc.titleRetention force and fatigue strength of overdenture attachment systemsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Campinas, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Dept Prosthodont & Periodontol, Piracicaba, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Araraquara Dent Sch, Araraquara, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Araraquara Dent Sch, Araraquara, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01308.x-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000223907700011-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Oral Rehabilitation-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.