You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/37461
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Henrique Martins-
dc.contributor.authorDelamaro, Mauricio Cesar-
dc.contributor.authorLoureiro, G.-
dc.contributor.authorCurran, R.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:27:30Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:02:20Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:27:30Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:02:20Z-
dc.date.issued2007-01-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-976-7_12-
dc.identifier.citationComplex Systems Concurrent Engineering: Collaboration, Technology Innovation and Sustainability. Godalming: Springer-verlag London Ltd, p. 99-106, 2007.-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/37461-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/37461-
dc.description.abstractEnterprises need continuous product development activities to remain competitive in the marketplace. Their product development process (PDP) must manage stakeholders' needs - technical, financial, legal, and environmental aspects, customer requirements, Corporate strategy, etc. -, being a multidisciplinary and strategic issue. An approach to use real option to support the decision-making process at PDP phases in taken. The real option valuation method is often presented as an alternative to the conventional net present value (NPV) approach. It is based on the same principals of financial options: the right to buy or sell financial values (mostly stocks) at a predetermined price, with no obligation to do so. In PDP, a multi-period approach that takes into account the flexibility of, for instance, being able to postpone prototyping and design decisions, waiting for more information about technologies, customer acceptance, funding, etc. In the present article, the state of the art of real options theory is prospected and a model to use the real options in PDP is proposed, so that financial aspects can be properly considered at each project phase of the product development. Conclusion is that such model can provide more robustness to the decisions processes within PDP.en
dc.format.extent99-106-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectreal options theorypt
dc.subjectproduct development processpt
dc.subjectriskpt
dc.subjectinvestment decision making under uncertaintypt
dc.titleProduct development process: Using real options for assessments and to support the decision-making at decision gatesen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Guaratingueta, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Guaratingueta, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-1-84628-976-7_12-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000248899900012-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofComplex Systems Concurrent Engineering: Collaboration, Technology Innovation and Sustainability-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.