You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/38325
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCecatti, J. G.-
dc.contributor.authorTedesco, R. P.-
dc.contributor.authorPires, HMB-
dc.contributor.authorCalderon, Iracema de Mattos Paranhos-
dc.contributor.authorFaundes, A.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:28:32Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:03:36Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:28:32Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:03:36Z-
dc.date.issued2006-01-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00016340500432580-
dc.identifier.citationActa Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. Oslo: Taylor & Francis As, v. 85, n. 6, p. 706-711, 2006.-
dc.identifier.issn0001-6349-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/38325-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/38325-
dc.description.abstractObjective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of misoprostol in two different formulations: vaginal tablets of 25 mu g and one-eighth of a 200-mu g oral tablet, also administered intravaginally, for cervical ripening and labor induction of term pregnancies with an indication for that. Methods. A single-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial was carried out in 120 pregnant women who randomly received one of the two formulations. The main dependent variables were mode of delivery, need for additional oxytocin, time between beginning of induction and delivery, perinatal results, complications, and maternal side effects. Student's t, Mann-Whitney, chi(2), Fisher's Exact, Wilcoxon and Kolmogorov-Smirnoff tests, as well as survival analysis, were used in the data analysis. Results. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of general characteristics, uterine contractility, and fetal well-being during labor, cesarean section rates, perinatal outcomes, or maternal adverse events. The mean time between the beginning of cervical ripening and delivery was 31.3 h in the vaginal tablet group and 30.1 h in the oral tablet group, a difference that was not statistically significant. Conclusion. The results showed that the 25-mu g vaginal tablets of misoprostol were as effective and safe for cervical ripening and labor induction as the dose-equivalent fraction of 200-mu g oral tablets.en
dc.format.extent706-711-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis As-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectmisoprostolpt
dc.subjectprostaglandinspt
dc.subjectcervical ripeningpt
dc.subjectlabor inductionpt
dc.titleEffectiveness and safety of a new vaginal misoprostol product specifically labeled for cervical ripening and labor inductionen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)-
dc.contributor.institutionSch Med Sci-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Campinas, Sch Med Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Campinas, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSch Med Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Jundiai, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationState Univ São Paulo, Sch Med Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Botucatu, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespState Univ São Paulo, Sch Med Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Botucatu, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00016340500432580-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000238188100011-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.