You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/38920
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCicogna, Antonio Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorPadovani, Carlos Roberto-
dc.contributor.authorBrooks, W. W.-
dc.contributor.authorSchine, L.-
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, K. G.-
dc.contributor.authorConrad, C. H.-
dc.contributor.authorGaasch, W. H.-
dc.contributor.authorBing, OHL-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:29:18Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:04:32Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:29:18Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:04:32Z-
dc.date.issued1993-08-01-
dc.identifierhttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_issues&pid=0100-879X&lng=en&nrm=iso-
dc.identifier.citationBrazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. São Paulo: Associação Bras Divulg Cientifica, v. 26, n. 8, p. 859-868, 1993.-
dc.identifier.issn0100-879X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/38920-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/38920-
dc.description.abstract1. To determine whether diltiazem protects the hypoxic myocardium by reducing contractile work, we have compared the effects of diltiazem and quiescence on left ventricular (LV) papillary muscle subjected to hypoxia. Papillary muscles were obtained from male Charles River CD rats weighing 150-250 g.2. Four groups of muscles were studied: control (N = 6), non-stimulation (N = 10), diltiazem 10(-4) M (N = 6) and diltiazem 10(-4) M plus non-stimulation (N = 10).3. Isolated mt LV papillary muscles were studied in Krebs-Henseleit solution with a calcium concentration of 2.52 mM at 28-degrees-C while contracting isometrically at a stimulation rate of 0.2 Hz. Resting tension and active isometric tension were measured.4. Both diltiazem and quiescence significantly attenuated contracture tension during hypoxia (0.91 +/- 0.10 vs 2.26 +/- 0.49 g/mm2 for diltiazem vs control, and 0.55 +/- 0.18 vs 2.26 +/- 0.49 g/mm2 for quiescence vs control). Recovery of active tension was improved in the diltiazem groups during reoxygenation (4.16 +/- 0.42 vs 3.75 +/- 0.51, 3.53 +/- 0.15 vs 2.90 +/- 0.13, 5.84 +/- 0.33 vs 6.48 +/- 0.29 and 5.98 +/- 0.90 vs 7.67 +/- 0.68 g/mm2 for diltiazem, diltiazem non-stimulation, non-stimulation and control groups).5. The results suggest that the protective effect of diltiazem during hypoxia was due to the reduction in energy demand of the myocardium.en
dc.format.extent859-868-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherAssociação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABRADIC)-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectISOLATED PAPILLARY MUSCLEpt
dc.subjectDILTIAZEMpt
dc.subjectQUIESCENCEpt
dc.subjectHYPOXIApt
dc.subjectHYPOXIC CONTRACTUREpt
dc.titlePROTECTIVE EFFECTS OF DILTIAZEM ON THE MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE OF THE HYPOXIC MYOCARDIUMen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionVET ADM MED CTR JAMAICA PLAIN-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationVET ADM MED CTR JAMAICA PLAIN,DEPT MED,BOSTON,MA 02130-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNIV ESTADUAL PAULISTA JULIO MESQUITA FILHO,FAC MED BOTUCATU,DEPT CLIN MED,BR-18618-000 BOTUCATU,SP,BRAZIL.-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:A1993LV31400010-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.