You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/39853
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBressan, Eriberto-
dc.contributor.authorSivolella, Stefano-
dc.contributor.authorAlmagro Urrutia, Zoraya-
dc.contributor.authorSalata, Luiz Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorLang, Niklaus Peter-
dc.contributor.authorBotticelli, Daniele-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:30:30Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:06:00Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:30:30Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:06:00Z-
dc.date.issued2012-05-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02432.x-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research. Hoboken: Wiley-blackwell, v. 23, n. 5, p. 536-541, 2012.-
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/39853-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/39853-
dc.description.abstractAim: To evaluate the effect of implant length (6 mm vs. 11 mm) on osseointegration (bone-toimplant contact) of implants installed into sockets immediately after tooth extraction.Material and methods: In six Labrador dogs, the pulp tissue of the mesial roots of P-3(3) was removed and the root canals were filled. Flaps were elevated bilaterally, the premolars hemisectioned and the distal roots removed. Recipient sites were prepared in the distal alveolus and a 6 mm or an 11 mm long implant was installed at the test and control sites, respectively. Non-submerged healing was allowed. After 4 months of healing, block sections of the implant sites were obtained for histological processing and peri-implant tissue assessment.Results: No statistically significant differences were found between test and control sites both for hard and soft tissue parameters. The bone-to-implant contact evaluated at the apical region of the implants was similar as well. Although not statistically significant, the location of the top of the bony crest at the buccal aspect was more apical in relation to the implant shoulder at the test compared with the control sites (2.0 +/- 1.4 and 1.2 +/- 1.1 mm, respectively).Conclusions: Shorter implants (6 mm) present with equal osseointegration than do longer implants (11 mm).en
dc.description.sponsorshipAriminum Research & Dental Education Center (ARDEC)-
dc.format.extent536-541-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectanimal studyen
dc.subjectextraction socketen
dc.subjectimplant dentistryen
dc.subjectshort implantsen
dc.subjecthard tissueen
dc.subjectsoft tissuesen
dc.subjectperi-implant mucosaen
dc.subjectosseointegrationen
dc.titleShort implants (6 mm) installed immediately into extraction sockets: An experimental study in dogsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Med Sci-
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Padua-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Hong Kong-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionARDEC-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Med Sci, Fac Dent, Havana, Cuba-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Padua, Sch Dent, Padua, Italy-
dc.description.affiliationUniv São Paulo, Fac Dent Ribeirao Preto SP, BR-05508 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dent Hosp, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China-
dc.description.affiliationUNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Fac Odontol Aracatuba, Aracatuba, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationARDEC, Ariminum Odontol, Rimini, Italy-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Fac Odontol Aracatuba, Aracatuba, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02432.x-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000302606800003-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Research-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.