Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/40183
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Pontes, J. H. F. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nonato-Junior, I. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sanches, B. V. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ereno-Junior, J. C. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Uvo, S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Barreiros, T. R. R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Oliveira, J. A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hasler, J. F. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Seneda, M. M. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-05-20T15:30:54Z | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-10-25T18:06:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-05-20T15:30:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-10-25T18:06:34Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009-03-01 | - |
dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.09.031 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Theriogenology. New York: Elsevier B.V., v. 71, n. 4, p. 690-697, 2009. | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0093-691X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/40183 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/40183 | - |
dc.description.abstract | To investigate why the preferred means to produce bovine embryos in Brazil has changed from in vivo to in vitro, we compared these two approaches in the same Nelore cows (n = 30) and assessed total embryo production and pregnancy rates. Without a specific schedule, all cows were subjected to ultrasound-guided ovum pick up (OPU)/in vitro production (IVP) and MOET, with intervals ranging from 15 to 45 d between procedures, respectively. To produce in vivo embryos, cows were superovulated and embryos were recovered nonsurgically from 1 to 3 times (1.4 +/- 0.6). whereas OPU/IVP was repeated from 1 to 5 times (3.2 +/- 1.2) in each donor cow during a 12-mo interval. Embryos obtained from both methods were transferred to crossbred heifers. on average. 25.6 +/- 15.3 immature oocytes were collected per OPU attempt. The average number of embryos produced by OPU/IVP (9.4 +/- 5.3) was higher (P < 0.05) than the MOET method (6.7 +/- 3.7). However, pregnancy rates were lower (P < 0.05) following transfer of IVP (33.5%) versus in vivo-derived embryos (41.5%) embryos. Embryonic losses between Days 30 and 60 and fetal sex ratio were similar (P > 0.05) between in vivo and in vitro-derived embryos. We concluded that in Nelore cows, with an interval of 15 d between OPU procedures, it was possible to produce more embryos and pregnancies compared to conventional MOET. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | en |
dc.format.extent | 690-697 | - |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier B.V. | - |
dc.source | Web of Science | - |
dc.subject | In vitro fertilization | en |
dc.subject | Ovum pick up | en |
dc.subject | Embryo transfer | en |
dc.subject | Cattle | en |
dc.subject | Nelore | en |
dc.title | Comparison of embryo yield and pregnancy rate between in vivo and in vitro methods in the same Nelore (Bos indicus) donor cows | en |
dc.type | outro | - |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) | - |
dc.contributor.institution | Mogi Mirim SP | - |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | - |
dc.contributor.institution | Bioniche Anim Hlth USA Inc | - |
dc.description.affiliation | DCV CCA UEL, Lab Reprod Anim, BR-86051990 Londrina, PR, Brazil | - |
dc.description.affiliation | Mogi Mirim SP, In Vitro Brasil Ltda, Mirim, SP, Brazil | - |
dc.description.affiliation | UNESP, FCAV, BR-14870000 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil | - |
dc.description.affiliation | Bioniche Anim Hlth USA Inc, Bogart, GA 30622 USA | - |
dc.description.affiliationUnesp | UNESP, FCAV, BR-14870000 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.09.031 | - |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000263310300017 | - |
dc.rights.accessRights | Acesso restrito | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Theriogenology | - |
Appears in Collections: | Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp |
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.