You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/40901
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCoraca, Debora Cristina-
dc.contributor.authorDuek, Eliana Aparaecida R.-
dc.contributor.authorPadovani, Carlos A.-
dc.contributor.authorCamilli, Jose Angelo-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:31:52Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:07:52Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:31:52Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:07:52Z-
dc.date.issued2008-07-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-008-3397-2-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Materials Science-materials In Medicine. Dordrecht: Springer, v. 19, n. 7, p. 2699-2704, 2008.-
dc.identifier.issn0957-4530-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/40901-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/40901-
dc.description.abstractNatural or synthetic materials may be used to aid tissue repair of fracture or pathologies where there has been a loss of bone mass. Polymeric materials have been widely studied, aiming at their use in orthopaedics and aesthetic plastic surgery. Polymeric biodegradable blends formed from two or more kinds of polymers could present faster degradation rate than homopolymers. The purpose of this work was to compare the biological response of two biomaterials: poly(L-lactic acid)PLLA and poly(L-lactic acid)PLLA/poly(ethylene oxide)PEO blend. Forty four-week-old rats were divided into two groups of 20 animals, of which one group received PLLA and the other PLLA/PEO implants. In each of the animals, one of the biomaterials was implanted in the proximal epiphysis of the right tibia. Each group was divided into subgroups of 5 animals, and sacrificed 2, 4, 8 and 16 weeks after surgery, respectively. Samples were then processed for analysis by light microscopy. Newly formed bone was found around both PLLA and PLLA/PEO implants. PLLA/PEO blends had a porous morphology after immersion in a buffer solution and in vivo implantation. The proportion 50/50 PLLA/PEO blend was adequate to promote this porous morphology, which resulted in gradual bone tissue growth into the implant.en
dc.format.extent2699-2704-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.titleOsteointegration of poly(L-lactic acid)PLLA and poly(L-lactic acid)PLLA/poly(ethylene oxide)PEO implants in rat tibiaeen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationState Univ Campinas UNICAMP, Inst Biol, Dept Anat, Campinas, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationState Univ Campinas UNICAMP, Fac Mech Engn, Campinas, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationPaulista State Univ UNESP, Agron Sci Fac, Botucatu, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespPaulista State Univ UNESP, Agron Sci Fac, Botucatu, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10856-008-3397-2-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000255879100023-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.