You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/41376
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPantani, Fabio-
dc.contributor.authorBotticelli, Daniele-
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Idelmo Rangel-
dc.contributor.authorSalata, Luiz Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Germana Jayme-
dc.contributor.authorLang, Niklaus P.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:32:29Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:08:44Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:32:29Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:08:44Z-
dc.date.issued2010-11-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01941.x-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research. Malden: Wiley-blackwell Publishing, Inc, v. 21, n. 11, p. 1264-1270, 2010.-
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/41376-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/41376-
dc.description.abstractAimTo study osseointegration and bone-level changes at implants installed using either a standard or a reduced diameter bur for implant bed preparation.Material and methodsIn six Labrador dogs, the first and second premolars were extracted bilaterally. Subsequently, mesial roots of the first molars were endodontically treated and distal roots, including the corresponding part of the crown, were extracted. After 3 months of healing, flaps were elevated and recipient sites were prepared in all experimental sites. The control site was prepared using a standard procedure, while the test site was prepared using a drill with a 0.2 mm reduced diameter than the standard one used in the contra-lateral side. After 4 months of healing, the animals were euthanized and biopsies were obtained for histological processing and evaluation.ResultsWith the exception of one implant that was lost, all implants were integrated in mineralized bone. The alveolar crest underwent resorption at control as well as at test sites (buccal aspect similar to 1 mm). The most coronal contact of bone-to-implant was located between 1.2 and 1.6 mm at the test and between 1.3 and 1.7 mm at the control sites. Bone-to-implant contact percentage was between 49% and 67%. No statistically significant differences were found for any of the outcome variables.ConclusionsAfter 4 months of healing, lateral pressure to the implant bed as reflected by higher insertion torques (36 vs. 15 N cm in the premolar and 19 vs. 7 N cm in the molar regions) did not affect the bone-to-implant contact.To cite this article:Pantani F, Botticelli D, Garcia IR Jr., Salata LA, Borges GJ, Lang NP. Influence of lateral pressure to the implant bed on osseointegration: an experimental study in dogs.Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21, 2010; 1264-1270.doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01941.x.en
dc.description.sponsorshipSweden Martina SRL-
dc.description.sponsorshipAriminum Research & Dental Education Center (ARDEC)-
dc.format.extent1264-1270-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectanimal studyen
dc.subjectbone healingen
dc.subjecthistologyen
dc.subjectimplant dentistryen
dc.subjectosseointegrationen
dc.subjecttorqueen
dc.titleInfluence of lateral pressure to the implant bed on osseointegration: an experimental study in dogsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionARDEC-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Hong Kong-
dc.description.affiliationUNESP São Paulo State Univ, Fac Dent Aracatuba, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationARDEC, Rimini, Italy-
dc.description.affiliationUniv São Paulo, Fac Dent Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationFO UFG Fed Univ Goias, Goiania, Go, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP São Paulo State Univ, Fac Dent Aracatuba, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01941.x-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000282688400008-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Research-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.