Você está no menu de acessibilidade

Utilize este identificador para citar ou criar um link para este item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/42163
Registro de metadados completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorGreco, Camila Coelho-
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, Luis Fabiano-
dc.contributor.authorCarita, Renato Aparecido Correa-
dc.contributor.authorDenadai, Benedito Sergio-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:33:35Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:10:12Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:33:35Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:10:12Z-
dc.date.issued2012-12-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1139/h2012-105-
dc.identifier.citationApplied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism-physiologie Appliquee Nutrition Et Metabolisme. Ottawa: Canadian Science Publishing, Nrc Research Press, v. 37, n. 6, p. 1147-1152, 2012.-
dc.identifier.issn1715-5312-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/42163-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/42163-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of recovery type (passive vs. active) during prolonged intermittent exercises on the blood lactate concentration (MLSS) and work rate (MLSSwint) at maximal lactate steady state. Nineteen male trained cyclists were divided into 2 groups for the determination of MLSSwint using passive (maximal oxygen uptake = 58.1 +/- 3.5 mL center dot kg(-1).min(-1); N = 9) or active recovery (maximal oxygen uptake = 60.3 +/- 9.0 mL center dot kg(-1).min(-1); N = 10). They performed the following tests, on different days, on a cycle ergometer: (i) incremental test until exhaustion to determine maximal oxygen uptake; (ii) 2 to 3 continuous submaximal constant work rate tests (CWRT) for the determination of the work rate at continuous maximal lactate steady state (MLSSwcont); and (iii) 2 to 3 intermittent submaximal CWRT (7 x 4 min and 1 x 2 min, with 2-min recovery) with either passive or active recovery for the determination of MLSSwint. MLSSwint was significantly higher when compared with MLSSwcont for both passive recovery (294.7 +/- 32.2 vs. 258.7 +/- 24.5 W, respectively) and active recovery groups (300.5 +/- 23.9 vs. 273.2 +/- 21.5 W, respectively). The percentage increments in MLSSwint were similar between conditions (passive = 13% vs. active = 10%). MLSS (mmol.L-1) was not significantly different between MLSSwcont and MLSSwint for either passive recovery (4.50 +/- 2.10 vs. 5.61 +/- 1.78, respectively) and active recovery (4.06 +/- 1.49 vs. 4.91 +/- 1.91, respectively) conditions. We can conclude that using a work/rest ratio of 2: 1, MLSSwint was similar to 10%-13% higher than MLSSwcont, irrespective of the recovery type performed during prolonged intermittent exercises.en
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)-
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)-
dc.format.extent1147-1152-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherCanadian Science Publishing, Nrc Research Press-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectcyclingen
dc.subjectaerobic evaluationen
dc.subjectinterval trainingen
dc.subjectconstant work rate testen
dc.titleIs maximal lactate steady state during intermittent cycling different for active compared with passive recovery?en
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationHuman Performance Lab, BR-13506900 Rio Claro, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1139/h2012-105-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000311483800016-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism = Physiologie Appliquee Nutrition Et Metabolisme-
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

Não há nenhum arquivo associado com este item.
 

Itens do Acervo digital da UNESP são protegidos por direitos autorais reservados a menos que seja expresso o contrário.