You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/42283
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPimentel, G. D.-
dc.contributor.authorBernhard, A. B.-
dc.contributor.authorFrezza, M. R. P.-
dc.contributor.authorRinaldi, A. E. M.-
dc.contributor.authorBurini, Roberto Carlos-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:33:44Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:10:25Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:33:44Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:10:25Z-
dc.date.issued2010-09-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3305/nh.2010.25.5.4618-
dc.identifier.citationNutricion Hospitalaria. Madrid: Aula Médica Ediciones, v. 25, n. 5, p. 741-745, 2010.-
dc.identifier.issn0212-1611-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/42283-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/42283-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Overweight and obesity are risk factors to appearance of cardiovascular diseases and anthropometry is important as clinical tool for planning and health policymaking at population level. Thus, aim of this work was to compare the simple body fat percentage (%BF) obtained straight by bioeletric impedance (BIA) to the one obtained by the equation of Segal et al (1988), which uses the BIA resistance value, overweight among adult women.Methods: This study conducted with 86 adult women (50.5 +/- 11.0 years old). Body weight and height were measured and estimated the body mass index (BIND. %BF was assessed by BIA (Biodynamics (R) model 450) and Segal equation.Results: %BF derived from BIA (38.0 +/- 4.6%) and Segal et al (1988) (38.7 +/- 8.1%) were similar (p = 0.85). However, when the women were distributed, in two groups based on their BMI, overweight (n = 40; BMI = 27.3 +/- 1.2 kg/m(2)) and obesity (n = 46; BMI = 36.2 +/- 5.1 kg/m(2)), the two methods presented results significant different (p = 0.000). The %BF of overweight women was 34.6 +/- 3.6% by BIA and 30.3 +/- 2.1% when estimated by Segal equation. In obese women, the %BF was 41.0 +/- 3.0% and 46.0 +/- 2.6%, respectively.Conclusion: BIA overestimated %BF in overweight (+14.2%; +3.0 kg) and underestimated in obese (-10.9%; -4.4 kg) women.en
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)-
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)-
dc.format.extent741-745-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherAula Médica Ediciones-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectBody compositionen
dc.subjectAnthropometricen
dc.subjectBody faten
dc.subjectObesityen
dc.titleBioelectric impedance overestimates the body fat in overweight and underestimates in Brazilian obese women: a comparation with Segal equation 1en
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)-
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed São Paulo UNIFESP, Dept Physiol, Div Nutr Physiol, São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Ctr Nutr & Exercise Metab CeMENutri, Botucatu Med Sch, Botucatu, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU), Sch Med, Uberlandia, MG, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Ctr Nutr & Exercise Metab CeMENutri, Botucatu Med Sch, Botucatu, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.3305/nh.2010.25.5.4618-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000282562800010-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.relation.ispartofNutricion Hospitalaria-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.