You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/42637
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSoares, Vanessa Mendonca-
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Juliano Goncalves-
dc.contributor.authorViana, Cibeli-
dc.contributor.authorIzidoro, Thiago Braga-
dc.contributor.authorBersot, Luciano dos Santos-
dc.contributor.authorPinto, José Paes de Almeida Nogueira-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:34:43Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:11:07Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:34:43Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:11:07Z-
dc.date.issued2012-06-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2011.12.028-
dc.identifier.citationFood Microbiology. London: Academic Press Ltd- Elsevier B.V. Ltd, v. 30, n. 2, p. 453-456, 2012.-
dc.identifier.issn0740-0020-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/42637-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/42637-
dc.description.abstractThe objectives of the present study were to evaluate the spread of Salmonella Enteritidis to different cutting boards (wood, triclosan-treated plastic, glass, and stainless steel) from contaminated poultry skin (5 log CFU/g) and then to tomatoes and to analyze the effect of different protocols used to clean these surfaces to control contamination. The following procedures were simulated: (1) no cleaning after handling contaminated poultry skin; (2) rinsing in running water; (3) cleaning with dish soap and mechanical scrubbing; and (4) cleaning with dish soap and mechanical scrubbing, followed by disinfection with hypochlorite. The pathogen was recovered from all surfaces following procedure 1, with counts ranging from 1.90 to 2.80 log, as well as from the tomatoes handled on it. Reduced numbers of S. Enteritidis were recovered using the other procedures, both from the surfaces and from the tomatoes. Counts were undetectable after procedure 4. From all surfaces evaluated, wood was the most difficult to clean, and stainless steel was the easiest. The use of hypochlorite as a disinfecting agent helped to reduce cross-contamination. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en
dc.format.extent453-456-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherAcademic Press Ltd Elsevier B.V. Ltd-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectCleaningen
dc.subjectCross-contaminationen
dc.subjectCutting boardsen
dc.subjectSalmonella Enteritidisen
dc.titleTransfer of Salmonella Enteritidis to four types of surfaces after cleaning procedures and cross-contamination to tomatoesen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)-
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Sch Vet Med & Anim Sci, BR-18618970 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), BR-85950000 Palotina, Parana, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Sch Vet Med & Anim Sci, BR-18618970 São Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.fm.2011.12.028-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000301897000016-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.identifier.fileWOS000301897000016.pdf-
dc.relation.ispartofFood Microbiology-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.