You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/6250
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSonsin, Julia O.-
dc.contributor.authorGasson, Peter E.-
dc.contributor.authorBarros, Claudia F.-
dc.contributor.authorMarcati, Carmen Regina-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:21:38Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T16:43:03Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:21:38Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T16:43:03Z-
dc.date.issued2012-10-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2012.01282.x-
dc.identifier.citationBotanical Journal of The Linnean Society. Hoboken: Wiley-blackwell, v. 170, n. 2, p. 257-276, 2012.-
dc.identifier.issn0024-4074-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/6250-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/6250-
dc.description.abstractA comparative study of the secondary xylem (wood) anatomy of 11 species (38 specimens) occurring in cerrado s.s. and the adjacent gallery forest (both cerrado s.l. habitat) was made with the aim of identifying the anatomical characteristics of ecological value and correlating them with the environmental conditions. The anatomical features that vary, in general, between the two habitats are: growth ring distinctness (well or poorly defined); tyloses and deposits (more abundant in cerrado specimens); gelatinous fibres (more evident in cerrado specimens and in different patterns between habitats); variation in paratracheal and banded parenchyma (more abundant in cerrado); and more cells per parenchyma strand in cerrado. In general, gallery forest specimens have wider vessels, fewer vessels per square millimetre and larger intervessel pits, indicating more efficient water conduction, whereas cerrado s.s. specimens are the opposite, with low vulnerability and mesomorphy indices, demonstrating greater safety under conditions of water stress. (c) 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, , .en
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)-
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)-
dc.format.extent257-276-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell-
dc.sourceWeb of Science-
dc.subjectcomparative wood anatomyen
dc.subjectecological wood anatomyen
dc.subjectsafety versus efficiencyen
dc.titleA comparison of the wood anatomy of 11 species from two cerrado habitats (cerrado s.s. and adjacent gallery forest)en
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionRoyal Bot Gardens-
dc.contributor.institutionInst Pesquisas Jardim Bot Rio de Janeiro-
dc.description.affiliationUNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Dept Recursos Nat, FCA, PG Ciência Florestal, BR-18603970 Botucatu, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationRoyal Bot Gardens, Jodrell Lab, Richmond TW9 3AB, Surrey, England-
dc.description.affiliationInst Pesquisas Jardim Bot Rio de Janeiro, BR-22460030 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Dept Recursos Nat, FCA, PG Ciência Florestal, BR-18603970 Botucatu, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1095-8339.2012.01282.x-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000308403700008-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.