You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/64478
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBechara, G. H.-
dc.contributor.authorSzabó, M. P J-
dc.contributor.authorMukai, L. S.-
dc.contributor.authorRosa, P. C S-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:17:56Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:13:19Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:17:56Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:13:19Z-
dc.date.issued1994-05-06-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4017(94)90038-8-
dc.identifier.citationVeterinary Parasitology, v. 52, n. 1-2, p. 79-90, 1994.-
dc.identifier.issn0304-4017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/64478-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/64478-
dc.description.abstractNaive experimental groups of dogs, hamsters and guinea pigs were inoculated three times subcutaneously with unfed adult extract of the tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus and challenged with adult R. sanguineus to evaluate resistance. The acquisition of resistance was based on alterations of some reproductive and feeding performance parameters of female ticks such as female and egg mass weights, engorgement, pre-oviposition and incubation periods, larval hatchability rate and efficiency rates of female ticks in converting their food reservoir to eggs and larvae. Dogs did not develop resistance under these experimental conditions; guinea pigs and hamsters, to a lesser extent, acquired an effective immunity to ticks as demonstrated by the impairment of the reproductive and feeding performance. However, the resistance induced by inoculation of the extract in the rodents seemed not to be as efficient as that induced by successive infestations.en
dc.format.extent79-90-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectquil a-
dc.subjectsaponin-
dc.subjectvaccine-
dc.subjectanimal experiment-
dc.subjectdog-
dc.subjectguinea pig-
dc.subjecthamster-
dc.subjecthost resistance-
dc.subjectimmunization-
dc.subjectinfestation-
dc.subjectnonhuman-
dc.subjectsubcutaneous drug administration-
dc.subjecttick-
dc.subjectAnimal-
dc.subjectDog Diseases-
dc.subjectDogs-
dc.subjectFemale-
dc.subjectGuinea Pigs-
dc.subjectHamsters-
dc.subjectMale-
dc.subjectSupport, Non-U.S. Gov't-
dc.subjectTick Infestations-
dc.subjectTicks-
dc.subjectVaccination-
dc.subjectAcari-
dc.subjectAnimalia-
dc.subjectCanis familiaris-
dc.subjectCavia-
dc.subjectCavia porcellus-
dc.subjectCricetinae-
dc.subjectRhipicephalus sanguineus-
dc.subjectRodentia-
dc.subjectSus scrofa-
dc.titleImmunisation of dogs, hamsters and guinea pigs against Rhipicephalus sanguineus using crude unfed adult tick extractsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)-
dc.description.affiliationPathology Department School of Veterinary Science of Jaboticabal University of the São Paulo State-UNESP, 14870-000, Jaboticabal, SP-
dc.description.affiliationPathology Department School of Veterinary Science University of São Paulo-USP, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationUnespPathology Department School of Veterinary Science of Jaboticabal University of the São Paulo State-UNESP, 14870-000, Jaboticabal, SP-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/0304-4017(94)90038-8-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofVeterinary Parasitology-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0028224420-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.