You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/64712
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCosta, H.-
dc.contributor.authorTalora, D. C.-
dc.contributor.authorPalma, Mario Sergio-
dc.contributor.authorChaud-Netto, J.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:18:03Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:13:42Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:18:03Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:13:42Z-
dc.date.issued1996-01-01-
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-79301996000100005-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Venomous Animals and Toxins, v. 2, n. 1, p. 39-45, 1996.-
dc.identifier.issn0104-7930-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/64712-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/64712-
dc.description.abstractThe effect of pheromones and their chemical analogues in honeybee alarm behaviors was studied in observation boxes. Defensive behaviors, as follows: a) attraction to scent source, b) elevation of wings in 'V', c) abdomen elevation, d) abdomen elevation and pumping and e) first leg pair elevation had been temporarily registered when the following compounds were presented: isoamyl alcohol, octyl alcohol, benzyl alcohol, n-butyl acetate, n-octyl acetate, isopentyl acetate, benzyl acetate and 2-heptanone. The results were as follows: 1. the bees elicited some characteristic behaviors when chemical alarm messages were presented, 2. agression (stinging) was not completed with any compound tested, probably because there was not a target (visual stimulus), 3. in all situations the attraction to scent source was low, 4. all the behaviors were elicited in a temporarily different way, 5. the compounds that elicited stronger responses and a greater number of the investigated behaviors were: isopentyl acetate, 2-heptanone, octyl acetate and n-octyl alcohol. In all situations, the first behavior response (and the most intense one) was the elevation and pumping the abdomen. This suggests that the chemical message was promptly recognized and then transmitted to each worker. So, the results obtained in the present work, suggest that chemical alarm messages may be recognized by different mechanisms of neural integration.en
dc.format.extent39-45-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectalarm behaviors-
dc.subjectApis mellifera-
dc.subjectchemical communication-
dc.subjectdefensive behavior-
dc.subjecthybrid honey bees-
dc.subjectpheromones-
dc.subjectacetic acid derivative-
dc.subjectalcohol derivative-
dc.subjectbenzyl acetate-
dc.subjectbenzyl alcohol-
dc.subjecthexanoic acid-
dc.subjectisopentyl acetate-
dc.subjectisopentyl alcohol-
dc.subjectmethadone-
dc.subjectoctanol-
dc.subjectpheromone-
dc.subjectanimal experiment-
dc.subjecthoneybee-
dc.subjectmodulation-
dc.subjectnonhuman-
dc.subjectsignal transduction-
dc.subjectstress-
dc.titleChemical communication in Apis mellifera: Temporal modulation of alarm behaviorsen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Biologia Instituto de Biociencias, Caixa Postal 199, CEP 13.506-900 Rio Claro, Sao Paulo-
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S0104-79301996000100005-
dc.identifier.scieloS0104-79301996000100005-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Venomous Animals and Toxins-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0029991219-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.