You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/65182
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFreire-Maia, Ademar-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:18:16Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:14:36Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:18:16Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:14:36Z-
dc.date.issued1997-09-01-
dc.identifierhttp://www.interciencia.org/v22_05/ensayo.html-
dc.identifier.citationInterciencia, v. 22, n. 5, p. 264-268, 1997.-
dc.identifier.issn0378-1844-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/65182-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/65182-
dc.description.abstractThe risks of accidents, illness and early death are part of life on Earth, which touches all living creatures, including Mankind. Because of modern mass communication media, the emotional impact of current risks are greater than in the past. Many unnecessary risks can and should be avoided, and with respect to others, they can be drastically reduced. In addition to this, some risks should be confronted in order to avoid greater ones. In any risk analysis, eventual benefits should be taken into consideration, the risks surrounding other activities, and other factors. Some risks examples and their implications are presented and discussed, in general Nuclear energy is specifically treated, but it also refers and comments that which surrounds other human activities (airplanes, automobiles, smog, gasoline, DDT, and coal energy). As in the history of aviation, nuclear industry has a history of greater successes than failures Nonetheless, in both cases, serious accidents deserve deep thought, including the increment of security norms. The current fear of some people to nuclear energy is compared to the unfounded fear at the advent of gasoline last century Risks, naturally, should not be exagerated, but they cannot be discarded. The main intention of the author is to discuss the complexity of the problem, and to see that risks are evaluated and accepted. In relation to nuclear energy, the author only mentions his point of view, defended in other publications, that it involves very high risks.en
dc.format.extent264-268-
dc.language.isopor-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.titleRiscos nucleares e outros riscos: Avaliação e aceitabilidadept
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationFederal de Biologia-
dc.description.affiliationUNESP-
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Genética Instituto de Biocièncias Universidade Estadual Paulista, 18618-000 Botucatu, São Paulo-
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartamento de Genética Instituto de Biocièncias Universidade Estadual Paulista, 18618-000 Botucatu, São Paulo-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto-
dc.relation.ispartofInterciencia-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-1842785542-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.