You are in the accessibility menu

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/65702
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMontelli, Augusto Cezar-
dc.contributor.authorSadatsune, Terue-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:19:42Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-25T18:15:35Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:19:42Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-25T18:15:35Z-
dc.date.issued1999-01-01-
dc.identifier.citationArquivos Brasileiros de Medicina, v. 73, n. 1-2, p. 27-32, 1999.-
dc.identifier.issn0365-0723-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/65702-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/65702-
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of cefepime, cefpirome and amikacin against the most prevalent nosocomial bacteria. Initially a prospective study was designed to compare the bacterial susceptibility to the three drugs using 1,022 pathogenic strains. The strains were isolated from hospitalized patients of the Hospital das Clinicas - Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, SP, from March to December of 1996, by using the Bauer-Kirby susceptibility diffusion controlled method. The activity of cefepime by the Kirby-Bauer method was significantly higher (χ2, p ≤ 0.05) than cefpirome and amikacin for the following bacteria: P. aeruginosa (72% x 56% x 64%, respectively), Enterobacter cloacae (98% x 88% x 80%) and total strains (79.5% x 74.3% x 76.8%). Cefpirome exhibited higher activity than cefepime only to Enterococcus faecalis (42% x 23%). In the 12 other bacterial groups studied the sensibility of the three drugs was similar (χ2, p ≥ 0.05). The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for 127 bacterial strains - Enterobacter cloacae (12), Citrobacter sp (15), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (50), Acinetobacter baumannii (12), BGNF others (22) and Enterococcus faecalis (16)-from the same origin previously described and isolated during 1997, was determined by E-test. Ranges of MIC intervals, MIC(50%), MIC(90%) and the proportion of the sensitive bacterial strains were determined and permitted the following analysis: the activity of cefepime against Gram-negative bacteria was 2 or more times higher than that of cefpirome and amikacin, specially when CIM(90%) was considered; the activity of cefpirome was higher only against E. faecalis. This information must be considered in the rational use of antibiotic, specially in patients with nosocomial infections.en
dc.format.extent27-32-
dc.language.isopor-
dc.sourceScopus-
dc.subjectAmikacin-
dc.subjectCefepime-
dc.subjectCefpirome-
dc.subjectNosocomial bacteria-
dc.subjectamikacin-
dc.subjectcefepime-
dc.subjectcefpirome-
dc.subjectantibiotic sensitivity-
dc.subjectantimicrobial activity-
dc.subjectbacterium culture-
dc.subjecthospital infection-
dc.subjecthuman-
dc.subjectin vitro study-
dc.subjectminimum inhibitory concentration-
dc.subjectnonhuman-
dc.titleAtividade comparada da cefepima, cefpiroma e amicacina em amostras bacterianas hospitalarespt
dc.title.alternativeComparative study of cefepime, cefpirome and amikacin activities against nosocomial bacteria isolatesen
dc.typeoutro-
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Clinica Medica Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Botucatu-
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartamento de Clinica Medica Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Botucatu-
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito-
dc.relation.ispartofArquivos Brasileiros de Medicina-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0032775195-
Appears in Collections:Artigos, TCCs, Teses e Dissertações da Unesp

There are no files associated with this item.
 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.